These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 600658)

  • 21. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A developmental study of filtering in visual attention.
    Enns JT; Akhtar N
    Child Dev; 1989 Oct; 60(5):1188-99. PubMed ID: 2805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of visual experience on the ability to form spatial mental models based on route and survey descriptions.
    Noordzij ML; Zuidhoek S; Postma A
    Cognition; 2006 Jun; 100(2):321-42. PubMed ID: 16043169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The activation of embedded words in spoken word identification is robust but constrained: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Bowers JS; Davis CJ; Mattys SL; Damian MF; Hanley D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1585-97. PubMed ID: 19803658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing.
    Borg E; Bergkvist C; Gustafsson D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3871-81. PubMed ID: 19507970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Processing of angry voices is modulated by visual load.
    Mothes-Lasch M; Miltner WH; Straube T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):485-90. PubMed ID: 22796986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():135-45. PubMed ID: 19747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selective interference during the retrieval of visual images.
    Janssen WH
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Nov; 28(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 1013280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.
    Turatto M; Mazza V; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B55-64. PubMed ID: 15925569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The written voice: implicit memory effects of voice characteristics following silent reading and auditory presentation.
    Abramson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1171-86. PubMed ID: 18380117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity to visual and auditory stimuli in children with developmental dyslexia.
    King B; Wood C; Faulkner D
    Dyslexia; 2008 May; 14(2):116-41. PubMed ID: 17937386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.