These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6017946)

  • 1. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: a comparison between their use in indigent and private patients.
    Willson JR; Ledger WJ; Lowell J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Jan; 29(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 6017946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Copper-7 intrauterine device (Gravigard). Report of experience].
    Jürgensen O; Stenzel I; Wirth A; Sina D; Taubert HD
    Fortschr Med; 1976 Mar; 94(9):515-21. PubMed ID: 964914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
    Custo GM; Cosmi EV
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications associated with IUD use in a family practice setting.
    Lewis RD; Shank C
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jan; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 759549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Mode of action, experiences, complications (author's transl)].
    Ludwig H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Feb; 36(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 943359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term use of intrauterine devices.
    Novak MK; Andolsek L; Balogh SA; Waszak CS
    IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Feb; 22(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pregnancies with intra-uterine devices in-situ (author's transl)].
    Obolensky W; Bucheli J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):632-9. PubMed ID: 1175906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Intrauterine contraception from the viewpoint of an ambulatory gynecologic department].
    Hagen P
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1981 Sep; 75(17):800-4. PubMed ID: 7345787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intra-uterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases.
    Das CR; Pradhan G
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1995 Oct; 93(10):375-6. PubMed ID: 9053409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
    Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure in intrauterine contraception. Analysis of 137 cases of unfavourable outcome.
    Calzolari E; Masciangelo R; Ciampaglia G; Steffè M; Parisi C; Maisano S; Pavia C; Dattilo D
    Panminerva Med; 1992; 34(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 1589253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptability study of the two versus three monthly injectable contraceptives.
    Aly FA; El-genedi MM; Toppozada HK; El-abd M; Loutfi I
    Dirasat Sukkaniyah; 1984; 11(69):27-39. PubMed ID: 12179796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of 52 pregnancies with intrauterine devices].
    Olivas Mendoza G; Hernández JG; Noriega Prieto JS; Castro Velarde RI; Thomas Del Río G; Inda Silva A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1981 Apr; 49(294):255-62. PubMed ID: 7327423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Contraception and subsequent fertility. Results of a retrospective study].
    Spira N; Spira A; Schwartz D
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Jan; 13(1 Suppl):353-8. PubMed ID: 12280206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.