These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A study of speech improvement following palatopharyngeal flap surgery. Engström K; Fritzell B; Johanson B Cleft Palate J; 1970 Apr; 7():419-31. PubMed ID: 5270488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Delayed pharyngeal flap success: report of a case. Neiman GS; Peterson SJ; Pruzansky S Cleft Palate J; 1975 Apr; 12():244-6. PubMed ID: 1054631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of transverse and vertical pharyngeal flaps using electromyography and judgments of nasality. Hathaway RR Cleft Palate J; 1980 Oct; 17(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 6934046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of velopharyngeal growth patterns between cleft lip and/or palate patients requiring or not requiring pharyngeal flap surgery. Mazaheri M; Athanasiou AE; Long RE Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Nov; 31(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 7833337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment of submucous cleft palate by pharyngeal flap as a primary procedure. Abdel-Aziz M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1093-7. PubMed ID: 17485122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Division of flap in cleft palate patients after posterior pharyngeal flap surgery]. Zhou ZB; Luo Y; Ma L Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):592-5. PubMed ID: 21176593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples. Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 Jul; 36(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 10426599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary movement on articulation, resonance, and velopharyngeal function. Kummer AW; Strife JL; Grau WH; Creaghead NA; Lee L Cleft Palate J; 1989 Jul; 26(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 2758671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Conversion of an inferiorly-based pharyngeal flap to a superiorly-based position. McEvitt WG Plast Reconstr Surg; 1971 Jul; 48(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 5556716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. An electromyographic study of pharyngeal flap operation. Chaco J; Yules RB Arch Otolaryngol; 1969 Jul; 90(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 5785992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A clarification of the surgical goals in cleft palate speech and the introduction of the lateral port control (l.p.c.) pharyngeal flap. Hogan VM Cleft Palate J; 1973 Oct; 10():331-45. PubMed ID: 4517978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Velar motility, velopharyngeal closure, and speech proficiency in cartilage pharyngoplasty: an eight year study. Hess DA; Hagerty RF; Mylin WK Cleft Palate J; 1968 Apr; 5():153-62. PubMed ID: 5244122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Patterns of velopharyngeal closure in subjects with repaired cleft palate and normal speech: a multi-view videofluoroscopic analysis. Skolnick ML; Shprintzen RJ; McCall GN; Rakoff S Cleft Palate J; 1975 Oct; 12():369-76. PubMed ID: 1058747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term results following velopharyngoplasty with a cranially based pharyngeal flap. Schmelzeisen R; Hausamen JE; Loebell E; Hacki T Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 Nov; 90(5):774-8. PubMed ID: 1410029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]