These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6036355)

  • 1. Learning to ignore irrelevant information.
    Rabbitt PM
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Mar; 80(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6036355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual discrimination learning in imbecile children with nonreinforcement of irrelevant tendencies.
    Lobb H
    Am J Ment Defic; 1966 Mar; 70(5):753-62. PubMed ID: 4222281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partial interocular transfer of visual discriminations in cats.
    Schissler DR; Riesen AH
    Dev Psychobiol; 1969; 2(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 5407658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination learning in mentally retarded children as a function of irrelevant dimension variability.
    Evans RA; Beedle RK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1970 Jan; 74(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 5434615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and transfer of categorization by retarded adults.
    Nye WC; McManis DL; Haugen DM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Sep; 77(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 5081088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer effects and response strategies in pattern-versus-component discrimination learning.
    Friedman MP
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 5908825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of verbal labeling and irrelevant stimulus dimensions on transposition of young EMR children.
    Richards SJ; Evans PL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Jul; 87(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 7124812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the visual discrimination of mentally retarded children: a training strategy.
    Crawford KA; Siegel PS
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Nov; 87(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 7180891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental trends in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information.
    Druker JF; Hagen JW
    Child Dev; 1969 Jun; 40(2):371-82. PubMed ID: 5808735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer effects in feature-positive and feature-negative learning by adult humans.
    Nallan GB; Brown MB; Edmonds C; Gillham V; Kowalewski K; Miller JS
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Sep; 94(3):417-29. PubMed ID: 7340522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transformation of task components into an integrated representation during task switching.
    Kleinsorge T; Gajewski PD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):334-45. PubMed ID: 17055442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capacity of severely subnormal children with relation to the non-additivity of cues effect and to discrimination difficulty.
    Glenn SM; Pickersgill MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1970 May; 22(2):305-17. PubMed ID: 5448690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of absolute and relational properties in the three-stimulus (ABB) configuration.
    Keeney TJ; Jenkins JR; Jenkins JJ
    Child Dev; 1969 Dec; 40(4):1223-31. PubMed ID: 5360392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of naming upon learning and transfer of learning in the mentally retarded.
    Smith MP; Means JR; Fishkin S
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Mar; 72(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 5646266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of multidimensional visual stimuli by mice: intra- and extradimensional shifts.
    Brigman JL; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM; Rothblat LA
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 119(3):839-42. PubMed ID: 15998206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning to filter out visual distractors.
    Gál V; Kozák LR; Kóbor I; Bankó EM; Serences JT; Vidnyánszky Z
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(8):1723-31. PubMed ID: 19385991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The disassociation of visual and acoustic conspecific cues decreases discrimination by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19685973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 May; 65(2):141-70. PubMed ID: 9169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.