These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6037904)

  • 1. Contralateral masking and the SISI-test in normal listeners.
    Blegvad B; Terkildsen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1967 Jun; 63(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 6037904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of contralateral broad-band noise on frequency discrimination.
    Labiak JM; Wilson WR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 77(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4829051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ON THE SUMMATION OF PITCH AND LOUDNESS IN AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION OF THE WHITE RAT.
    HYTOENEN Y
    Ann Acad Sci Fenn A; 1964; 106():SUPPL 6:1-9. PubMed ID: 14202155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SISI test: a review. Part II.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Redden RB
    Audiology; 1982; 21(5):365-85. PubMed ID: 6751308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):945-56. PubMed ID: 16938982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1687-95. PubMed ID: 26428806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric functions for level discrimination in cochlearly impaired and normal listeners with equivalent-threshold masking.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Zwicker T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):853-61. PubMed ID: 7642824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of masker spectrum level on masking-level differences at low signal frequencies.
    Dolan TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Dec; 44(6):1507-12. PubMed ID: 5702024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex-Tone Pitch Discrimination in Listeners With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Bianchi F; Fereczkowski M; Zaar J; Santurette S; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A procedure for the early detection of noise-susceptible individuals.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Jan; 37(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1246949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comodulation masking release for elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms.
    Peters RW; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2674-82. PubMed ID: 7983273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head Shadow and Binaural Squelch for Unilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implantees.
    Bernstein JGW; Schuchman GI; Rivera AL
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):e195-e202. PubMed ID: 28570414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Larson LL; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1881-7. PubMed ID: 3611509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.