These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 603818)

  • 1. A multifunctional prosthesis control system based on time series identification of EMG signals using microprocessors.
    Graupe D; Beex AA; Monlux WJ; Magnussen I
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1977; 10(27):4-16. PubMed ID: 603818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Selective nerve transfers to improve the control of myoelectrical arm prostheses].
    Aszmann OC; Dietl H; Frey M
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2008 Feb; 40(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 18322900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High density electromyography data of normally limbed and transradial amputee subjects for multifunction prosthetic control.
    Daley H; Englehart K; Hargrove L; Kuruganti U
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 22269773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a unified theory for simultaneous multiple axis artificial arm control.
    Jerard RB; Jacobsen SC
    J Biomech Eng; 1980 Aug; 102(3):199. PubMed ID: 19530801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditioning and sampling issues of EMG signals in motion recognition of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses.
    Li G; Li Y; Yu L; Geng Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1779-87. PubMed ID: 21293972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A self-contained, mechanomyography-driven externally powered prosthesis.
    Silva J; Heim W; Chau T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 86(10):2066-70. PubMed ID: 16213256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time and offline performance of pattern recognition myoelectric control using a generic electrode grid with targeted muscle reinnervation patients.
    Tkach DC; Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jul; 22(4):727-34. PubMed ID: 24760931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees.
    Geng Y; Zhou P; Li G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 9():74. PubMed ID: 23036049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multifunctional prosthesis and orthosis control via microcomputer identification of temporal pattern differences in single-site myoelectric signals.
    Graupe D; Salahi J; Kohn KH
    J Biomed Eng; 1982 Jan; 4(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7078136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies toward a practical computer-aided arm prosthesis system.
    Lyman J; Freedy A; Solomonow M
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1974; ():213-25. PubMed ID: 4462901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental development of a sensory control system for an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis with cosmetic covering.
    Tura A; Lamberti C; Davalli A; Sacchetti R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 9505249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pattern-recognition arm prosthesis: a historical perspective-a final report.
    Wirta RW; Taylor DR; Finley FR
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1978; ():8-35. PubMed ID: 365281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online electromyographic control of a robotic prosthesis.
    Shenoy P; Miller KJ; Crawford B; Rao RN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1128-35. PubMed ID: 18334405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor control over the phantom limb in above-elbow amputees and its relationship with phantom limb pain.
    Gagné M; Reilly KT; Hétu S; Mercier C
    Neuroscience; 2009 Aug; 162(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 19406214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital approaches to myoelectric state control of prostheses.
    Philipson L; Childress DS; Strysik J
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1981; 10-36():3-11. PubMed ID: 7344755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Principal components analysis preprocessing for improved classification accuracies in pattern-recognition-based myoelectric control.
    Hargrove LJ; Li G; Englehart KB; Hudgins BS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1407-14. PubMed ID: 19473932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of finger activation for use in a robotic prosthesis arm.
    Peleg D; Braiman E; Yom-Tov E; Inbar GF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Dec; 10(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 12611366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-Time EMG Based Pattern Recognition Control for Hand Prostheses: A Review on Existing Methods, Challenges and Future Implementation.
    Parajuli N; Sreenivasan N; Bifulco P; Cesarelli M; Savino S; Niola V; Esposito D; Hamilton TJ; Naik GR; Gunawardana U; Gargiulo GD
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31652616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.