These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Visual and tactile tracking with step commands. NASA CR-623. Bliss JC; Brody WR; Lane B NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Feb; ():119-61. PubMed ID: 5297962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of kinesthetic-tactual and visual displays via a critical tracking task. Jagacinski RJ; Miller DP; Gilson RD Hum Factors; 1979 Feb; 21(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 468269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative effects of display mode and input function on tracking performance. Christ RE; Newton RR J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 85(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 5482025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between motor learning and visual and arm adaptation under conditions of computer-stimulated visual distortion. Gyr J; Willey R; Gordon DG Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Oct; 35(2):551-61. PubMed ID: 5081286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human operator describing functions with visual and tactile displays. NASA CR-623. Bliss JC NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Feb; ():163-75. PubMed ID: 5297966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task. Schori TR Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Studies on sensory feedback. 3. The effects of display gain on tracking performance. Chase RA; Cullen JK; Openshaw JW; Sullivan SA Q J Exp Psychol; 1965 Aug; 17(3):193-208. PubMed ID: 5827075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of randomly delayed visual and auditory feedback on keying performance. Long J Ergonomics; 1975 May; 18(3):337-47. PubMed ID: 1193082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditorily paced keytapping performance during synchronous, decreased, and delayed visual feedback. Karlovich RS; Graham JT Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):731-43. PubMed ID: 5657713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility: a review, analysis and device demonstration. NASA Contract Rep NASA CR-874. Wargo MJ; Kelley CR; Mitchell MB; Prosin DJ NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1967 Nov; ():1-74. PubMed ID: 4175131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring performance on visual and auditory displays. Jones TN; Kirk RE Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Feb; 30(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 5476109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supplementary visual stimuli and rotary pursuit performance. Gordon NB; Warner A Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Dec; 27(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 5720382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of visual and proprioceptive response times in the learning of a motor skill. Jordan TC Q J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 24(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 4648989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist. Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance. Liu YC; Jhuang JW Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]