These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 603949)

  • 1. [Screening-exploratory audiometry].
    Tománek R; Vrkoc P; Zemanová E; Stuchlík V; Hora V; Kolenová D
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1977 Oct; 26(5):272-9. PubMed ID: 603949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [EEG- and COR-audiometry in childhood within the frame of an age related mass screening].
    Weymar P; Mahler KF; Schmieschek J; Stürzebecher J
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1974 Aug; 68(16):850-4. PubMed ID: 4440004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary studies of auditory fusion frequency in noise effects].
    Cheng H; Liu F; Shan Y
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Sep; 31(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 9812606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided group audiometry.
    Hashimoto T; Murata K; Minami S; Taniguchi I; Katayama Y
    J Aud Res; 1977 Apr; 17(2):59-76. PubMed ID: 357409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determination of the auditory threshold in subjects with hypoacusis, using CPRA (cochleo-palpebral response audiometry)].
    Pagliarulo E; Zito F
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1978 Jun; 54(11):994-9. PubMed ID: 743419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise-excluding enclosure for audiometry.
    Stark EW; Borton TE
    Audiology; 1975; 14(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 1131126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold.
    Woodford CM
    ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) under hypnosis.
    Grisanti G; Cusimano F; Traina F
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 7349304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Differential threshold and perstimulatory and poststimulatory masking in the diagnosis of hearing fatique].
    Tománek R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1972 Jun; 21(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 5043236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ABR in pediatric audiology.
    Mjøen S
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():141-6. PubMed ID: 6944771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The reaction time as a source of error in threshold audiometry (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1977 Oct; 25(10):353-7. PubMed ID: 914662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Békesy's audiometry in the noisy environment of audio professional. auditory thresholds and the masking of noise in sound technicians with normal hearing].
    Tománek R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1974 Feb; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 4452101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral audiometry in infants.
    Ruth RA; Horner JS; McCoy GS; Chandler CR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 17():94-8. PubMed ID: 6577570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Brain stem potentials and the auditory threshold].
    Novák M; Janisch R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7067008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Masking of the ear not studied in determining the auditory perception thresholds for ultrasound].
    Khechinashvili SN; Gigineĭshvili GM; Shafir I
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1975; (2):23-8. PubMed ID: 1146072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A method for the objective evaluation of the auditory threshold].
    Dahl D; Lübcke PF; Werbs M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1976; 14():79-81. PubMed ID: 1032343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed to occupational noise.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    B-ENT; 2008; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18949961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of sweep-frequency audiometry.
    Passchier-Vermeer W; van den Eijk J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1974 Jun; 35(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 4838992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pure tone delayed auditory feedback: development of criteria of performance deterioration.
    Cooper WA; Stokinger TE; Billings BL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):192-6. PubMed ID: 956005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Monaural and binaural equal-loudness matches for tones of different frequency by automatic audiometry].
    Karjalainen S
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 325():1-43. PubMed ID: 4534028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.