These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6041684)

  • 1. Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears.
    Shankweiler D; Studdert-Kennedy M
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1967 Feb; 19(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 6041684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels.
    Darwin CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 Feb; 23(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 5549664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuromagnetic responses to vowels vs. tones reveal hemispheric lateralization.
    Kirveskari E; Salmelin R; Hari R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 16403672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effect of cochlear sensorineural hearing loss on binaural integration mechanisms].
    Zenker Castro F; Mora Espino R; de Lucas Carmona G; Fernández Belda R; Marro Cosials S; Barajas de Prat JJ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008; 59(6):269-76. PubMed ID: 18588786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing.
    Bonatti LL; Peña M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jun; 16(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 15943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Left-right differences in auditory perception of verbal and non-verbal material by children.
    Bakker DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 19(4):334-6. PubMed ID: 6080918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of handedness in tactile speech perception.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 8158558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateralized processes constrain auditory reinforcement in human newborns.
    DeCasper AJ; Prescott P
    Hear Res; 2009 Sep; 255(1-2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19563874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests of auditory perception in the assessment and management of patients with cerebral cranial injury.
    Bergman M; Hirsch S; Najenson T
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1977; 9(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 594699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Age-related characteristics of human perception of emotions in speech and in singing].
    Morozov VP; Dmitrieva ES; Zaĭtseva KA; Karmanova VIu; Sukhanova NV
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1983; 19(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 6880477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of viewing speech on auditory speech processing is different in the left and right hemispheres.
    Davis C; Kislyuk D; Kim J; Sams M
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():151-61. PubMed ID: 18538750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants.
    Pons F; Toro JM
    Cognition; 2010 Sep; 116(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 20557881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Neuropsychological studies of two subjects after the transection of the splenium of the corpus callosum. (Part 2. The auditory recognition by the dichotic listening test) (author's transl)].
    Watanabe S; Hojo K; Sato T; Tanaka T; Watanabe K; Yoshimura I
    No To Shinkei; 1979 Oct; 31(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 508438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech?
    Shtyrov Y; Pihko E; Pulvermüller F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16023039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding and the REA for speech signals.
    Haggard MP
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 Feb; 23(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 5549663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception.
    Summerfield Q
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jan; 335(1273):71-8. PubMed ID: 1348140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
    Zaehle T; Wüstenberg T; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2447-56. PubMed ID: 15525285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct fMRI responses to laughter, speech, and sounds along the human peri-sylvian cortex.
    Meyer M; Zysset S; von Cramon DY; Alter K
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 15993767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech lateralization and attention/executive functions in a Finnish family with specific language impairment (SLI).
    Niemi J; Gundersen H; Leppäsaari T; Hugdahl K
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 12911100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.