118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6043212)
1. New smear method used in detecting uterine cancer.
J Maine Med Assoc; 1967 Jan; 58(1):30d. PubMed ID: 6043212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new device for detecting carcinoma of the uterus.
Ayre JE
Acta Cytol; 1970 Feb; 14(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 5264433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Self collecting smear (a mass screening study of uterine cancer).
Yokoyama Y; Iwata R; Majima T; Hongo J; Murakami S
J Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1968 Oct; 15(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 5708332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Gravlee-method: an alternative to the Pap smear?
Austin JM; Cain MG; Hicks J; Wolf FS
Am J Nurs; 1983 Jul; 83(7):1057-8. PubMed ID: 6553461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safeguard against uterine cancer. Responding to the vaginal smear report.
Loeb RA
Pa Med; 1970 Aug; 73(8):64. PubMed ID: 5525153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the vaginal irrigation smear as a screening procedure.
Hilker RR; Carrow LA; Elesh RH; Eggum PR
J Occup Med; 1968 Oct; 10(10):600-4. PubMed ID: 5686672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cervicovaginal smears in screening for uterine cancer].
Oppermann A; Pageaut G
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):643-5. PubMed ID: 5148537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of superficial cells in the vaginal smear of postmenopausal women.
Srivannaboon S; Pengvanich C; Suthamasa A; Bhusahas A
J Med Assoc Thai; 1976 Mar; 59(3):106-8. PubMed ID: 1262764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lag time in uterine cancer diagnosis. Potential versus performance.
Loeb RA
Pa Med; 1971 Apr; 74(4):44. PubMed ID: 5147643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Merits and disadvantages of various types of vaginal smear tests for cancer].
Mizuno J; Tsukahara H; Yasuda Y
Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1968 Jan; 17(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 5695411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The vaginal cancer smear; a five-year follow-up study of patients who had previous negative smears.
McGOOGAN LS
Nebr State Med J; 1959 Jul; 44(7):315-9. PubMed ID: 13666899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine vaginal smears on hospital admission.
Liu W
Obstet Gynecol; 1965 Oct; 26(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 5889769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening for uterine cancer in Aichi-ken].
Kimura H; Ishihara M; Oike T
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1966 Feb; 18(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 5950404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Extragenital causes of a positive vaginal smear].
Jahoda E
Osterr Z Erforsch Bekampf Krebskr; 1972; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 5068001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal irrigation cytology.
Moss TC; Farrow CC
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1966 Jul; 59(7):665-7. PubMed ID: 5945646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The use and abuse of the Pap smear.
Fox CH; Lawrence W; Horsley JS
Va Med Mon (1918); 1969 Feb; 96(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 5773893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Considerations on the colpocytological diagnosis of neoplasms of the endometrium].
França LC; Netto Cde G; Velloni M; de Lemos S
Matern Infanc (Sao Paulo); 1966; 25(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 5931990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of guidelines for cancer screening.
Gusberg SB
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 83():25-32. PubMed ID: 7088984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Vaginal cytodiagnosis for general practitioners. (Results and evaluation of 11,433 sent specimens)].
Jaeger J; Erdenen S
Z Allgemeinmed; 1964 Dec; 40(36):1551-3. PubMed ID: 5889486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
