These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6043853)

  • 1. Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcement contingencies on learner performance.
    Sullivan HJ; Baker RL; Schutz RE
    J Educ Psychol; 1967 Jun; 58(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 6043853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcement contingencies on learner performance. AMRL-TR-66-138.
    Sullivan HJ; Baker RL; Schutz RE
    AMRL TR; 1966 Dec; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 5298166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedback utilization styles of paranoid patients.
    Hilf FD; Wittner WK; Kopell BS
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1969 Dec; 149(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 5354995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of performance on the rod-and-frame test through token reinforcement procedures.
    McAllister LW
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1970 Apr; 75(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 5422506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge of results and motor learning.
    Newell KM
    Exerc Sport Sci Rev; 1976; 4():195-228. PubMed ID: 798689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplementary knowledge of results.
    Maltzman E; Holz WC; Kunze J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Nov; 8(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 5851398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EFFECTS OF KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS ON A VERBAL MEDIATING RESPONSE.
    PETERSON MJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Oct; 66():394-8. PubMed ID: 14053256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy.
    Hemayattalab R
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2766-72. PubMed ID: 25086427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments of learning are significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively poor trials despite no actual learning differences.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2016 Feb; 45():63-70. PubMed ID: 26599371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Learning contingencies without explicit reinforcement].
    Pérez Fernández VJ; García García A
    Psicothema; 2010 Aug; 22(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 20667269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill.
    Butki BD; Hoffman SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):569-80. PubMed ID: 14620246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive regulation of associative learning in a neural network by reinforcement and attentive feedback.
    Grossberg S; Levine D; Schmajuk N
    Int J Neurol; 1987-1988; 21-22():83-104. PubMed ID: 2980694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal.
    Salmoni AW; Schmidt RA; Walter CB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 May; 95(3):355-86. PubMed ID: 6399752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related changes in deterministic learning from positive versus negative performance feedback.
    van de Vijver I; Ridderinkhof KR; de Wit S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(5):595-619. PubMed ID: 25761598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of knowledge of results on attitude formed toward a motor learning task.
    McConnell A
    Res Q; 1976 Oct; 47(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 1069328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of external feedback on the rate of positive self-reinforcement.
    Marston AR
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Apr; 80(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 5787411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcement delay during learning on the retention of verbal material in adults.
    Lintz LM; Brackbill Y
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Feb; 71(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 5903007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.
    Anderson DI; Magill RA; Sekiya H; Ryan G
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15883120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of failure: feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency.
    van der Helden J; Boksem MA; Blom JH
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1596-603. PubMed ID: 19840974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cholinergic feedback circuit to regulate striatal population uncertainty and optimize reinforcement learning.
    Franklin NT; Frank MJ
    Elife; 2015 Dec; 4():. PubMed ID: 26705698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.