These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Intraoperative laryngeal electromyography in children with vocal fold immobility: a simplified technique. Scott AR; Chong PS; Randolph GW; Hartnick CJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 72(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 18006083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Electroneurography of the laryngeal nerves in the awake patient using electromyography of the larynx under zoom-endoscopic-control (author's transl)]. Thumfart W; Gschwandtner R Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Nov; 59(11):727-36. PubMed ID: 7464358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Electromyography of the larynx with skin surface electrodes]. Boemke W; Gerull G; Hippel K Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1992; 44(5):220-30. PubMed ID: 1490645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the EMG amplifier filter settings on the motor unit action potential parameters recorded with concentric and monopolar needles. Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 26(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 3830043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The study of laryngeal muscle activity in normal human subjects and in patients with laryngeal dystonia using multiple fine-wire electromyography. Hillel AD Laryngoscope; 2001 Apr; 111(4 Pt 2 Suppl 97):1-47. PubMed ID: 11464801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of the method of recording motor unit action potentials in man with a needle electrode. Khamitov KhS; Bogdanov EI; Khabirov FA Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 4077066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles. Chan RC; Hsu TC Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electromyography in the evaluation of muscle diseases. Buchthal F Neurol Clin; 1985 Aug; 3(3):573-98. PubMed ID: 3900682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis. Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of concentric needle versus hooked-wire electrodes in the canine larynx. Jaffe DM; Solomon NP; Robinson RA; Hoffman HT; Luschei ES Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 9591865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single fiber macro versus concentric trigger macro EMG: a comparison of methods. Nix WA; Scherer A Muscle Nerve; 1992 Feb; 15(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 1549140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Various new findings during the electromyographic examination of m. masseter]. Muska K; MULER D Cesk Stomatol; 1974 Sep; 74(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 4528372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Laryngeal electromyography during speech and song]. Siirde EK; Särgava VA Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1972; 32(5):80-2. PubMed ID: 4659526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Optimization of a method for recording the action potentials of human motor units using a needle electrode]. Khamitov KhS; Bogdanov EI; Khabirov FA Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(1):164-6. PubMed ID: 3979706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]