These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 604679)

  • 41. Bone-conduction vibrators. Calibration by input-voltage measurements.
    Fria TJ; Keating LW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1971 Aug; 94(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 5556268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of noise cancellation earphones in out-of-booth audiometric evaluations.
    Clark JG; Brady M; Earl BR; Scheifele PM; Snyder L; Clark SD
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28783994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Technical state of audiometers in hearing conservation programmes - Can we determine hearing threshold correctly?
    Pfeiffer BH
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):283-91. PubMed ID: 6939099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Safe and reliable sound threshold measures with direct vibration of the ossicular chain.
    Maassen MM; Rodriguez Jorge J; Herberhold S; Vonthein R; Zimmermann R; Baumann I; Brosch S; Mauz PS; Pfister M; Zalaman IM; Löwenheim H; Zenner HP
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Nov; 114(11):2012-20. PubMed ID: 15510033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Attempt at establishing a normal range of values for bone conduction hearing thresholds in tone audiometry].
    Gierek T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1974; 28(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 4437934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Administering audiometric speech tests via bone conduction: a comparison of transducers.
    Dolan TG; Morris SG
    Ear Hear; 1990 Dec; 11(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2073978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bone conduction reception: head sensitivity mapping.
    McBride M; Letowski T; Tran P
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):702-18. PubMed ID: 18432447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.
    Margolis RH; Glasberg BR; Creeke S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 20109081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reference zero for the calibration of air-conduction audiometric equipment using 'tone bursts' as test signals.
    Fedtke T; Richter U
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17365049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [A practical method to differentiate the sensations of hearing and feeling (auditory and vibration threshold) in the low-frequency range (author's transl)].
    Hülse M; Wisser R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Dec; 60(12):624-7. PubMed ID: 7345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transmission of bone conducted sound - correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibration.
    Eeg-Olofsson M; Stenfelt S; Taghavi H; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Tengstrand T; Finizia C
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():11-20. PubMed ID: 24047594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Air-bone gap estimated with multiple auditory steady-state response in young children with otitis media with effusion.
    Nagashima H; Udaka J; Chida I; Shimada A; Kondo E; Takeda N
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Dec; 40(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 23694737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Determination of audiometric zero point for air and bone conductivity in extended range of high frequency].
    Gierek T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1979; 33(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 460887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Audiometric bone conduction.
    Milburn B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 11(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 733251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. AMBAND Bone-Conduction Headband.
    Margolis RH; Margolis JC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):214-219. PubMed ID: 35042247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.