These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. EFFECT OF PATTERN OF REINFORCEMENT ON THE CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE. PASSEY GE; WOOD DL J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():241-4. PubMed ID: 14047763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DIFFERENTIAL EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF THE FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY OF AUDITORY CSS. MOORE JW J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():250-9. PubMed ID: 14215423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule. RUNQUIST WN J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jun; 65():617-8. PubMed ID: 13975554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF THE CLASSICALLY CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE IN THE RABBIT. THOMAS E; WAGNER AR J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Aug; 58():157-8. PubMed ID: 14197034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. UCS INTENSITY AND THE ASSOCIATIVE STRENGTH OF THE EYELID CR WITH A MASKED CONDITIONING PROCEDURE. HOMZIE MJ; WEISS G J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():101-3. PubMed ID: 14256240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. EFFECT OF A NUMBER OF ACQUISITION TRIALS AND THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF THE UCS ON EXTINCTION OF THE EYELID CR. SPENCE KW; RUTLEDGE EF; TALBOTT JH J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():286-91. PubMed ID: 14054385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement. Newman FL J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 75(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 6079859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning. Fleming RA; Grant DA; North JA; Levy CM J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 5655122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Delay of positive reinforcement in instrumental eyelid conditioning. Cerekwicki LE; Grant DA J Exp Psychol; 1967 Nov; 75(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 6079851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50 per cent partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning. Foth DL; Runquist WN J Exp Psychol; 1970 May; 84(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 5480924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Eyelid trace conditioning, CS intensity, CS-UCS interval, and a correction for "spontaneous" blinking. Lipkin SG; Moore JW J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 72(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 5966620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration with drive equated. Dufort RH J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jul; 74(3):321-3. PubMed ID: 6059388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES. LYON DO J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jul; 7(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 14176272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-modal differentiation under identical reinforcement schedules, and UCS-intensity effects in human classical eyelid conditioning. Furedy JJ Can J Psychol; 1971 Feb; 25(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5157750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some effects of various schedules of verbal reinforcement on self-reference responses. Phelan JG; Tang T; Hekmat H J Psychol; 1967 Sep; 67(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 6059474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's escape performance as a function of schedules of delay of reinforcement. Penney RK J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jan; 73(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 6031649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential eyelid conditioning to stimulus compounds as a function of temporal relations between stimuli. Vandament WE Psychol Rep; 1967 Aug; 21(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 6078358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]