These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6050468)
1. Equivalence of maximum likelihood and the method of moments in probit analysis. Mantel N; Greenhouse SW Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):154-7. PubMed ID: 6050468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A general maximum likelihood discriminant. Day NE; Kerridge DF Biometrics; 1967 Jun; 23(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 6051594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into gaussian components. Bhattacharya CG Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):115-35. PubMed ID: 6050463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The relation between score tests and approximate UMPU tests in exponential models common in biometry. Gart JJ; Tarone RE Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):781-6. PubMed ID: 6652208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Some probability models describing the variation in the number of out-migration at micro level. Sharma HL Janasamkhya; 1991 Jun; 9(1-2):43-60. PubMed ID: 12287691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Some biometric problems of model search in multidimensional contingency table analysis]. Deutschmann C Z Gesamte Hyg; 1988 Mar; 34(3):192-4. PubMed ID: 3388907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Employment of time series theory in experimental medicine (author's transl)]. Mager PP Acta Histochem; 1974; 49(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 4214073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximum likelihood and the efficiency of the method of moments. SHENTON LR Biometrika; 1950 Jun; 37(1-2):111-6. PubMed ID: 15420256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error. Roy S; Banerjee T Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A model for analysis of symptom clusters in alternative symptoms]. Hansert E Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973; 7():187-96. PubMed ID: 4533040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrimination between alternative binary response models. Chambers EA; Cox DR Biometrika; 1967 Dec; 54(3):573-8. PubMed ID: 6064019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple example of a comparison involving quantal data. Cox DR Biometrika; 1966 Jun; 53(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 5964059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On the use of the generalised extreme-value distribution in estimating extreme percentiles. Maritz JS; Munro AH Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):79-103. PubMed ID: 6050474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood. Morrell CH Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Likelihood methods for treatment noncompliance and subsequent nonresponse in randomized trials. O'Malley AJ; Normand SL Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 16011678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum likelihood applied to a capture-recapture model. Sprott DA Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 7272420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]