These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6053095)

  • 1. Attempts to improve perceptual clarity in an aircraft display.
    Huddleston HF; Samuel GD
    Nature; 1967 Aug; 215(5102):787-8. PubMed ID: 6053095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feedback strategies for visual search in airframe structural inspection.
    Gramopadhye AK; Drury CG; Sharit J
    Int J Ind Ergon; 1997 May; 19(5):333-44. PubMed ID: 11540601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some effects of display symbol variation upon operator performance in aircraft interception.
    Munns M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):Suppl:1215+. PubMed ID: 5675691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EFFECTS OF PRACTICE ON DIAL READING.
    CARVETH JW; ADAMS JA
    Hum Factors; 1964 Feb; 6():81-5. PubMed ID: 14187266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SHARED SPECTRUM DISPLAY ENHANCEMENT. ESD-TR-64-673.
    ROGERS JG; DETAMBEL MH; BIEN AR
    Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div; 1965 Jan; 27():1-56. PubMed ID: 14282789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser projection versus a CRT display in the visual perception of aircraft aspect.
    Niall KK
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(4):630-43. PubMed ID: 12691370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Visual ergonomy and flying safety. The importance of recognizing the instruments].
    Draeger J
    Ophthalmologe; 2009 Apr; 106(4):370-3. PubMed ID: 19153748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of operational factors on the perceived structure of real-world scenes viewed during low-altitude, high-speed flight.
    Kleiss JA
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):335-58. PubMed ID: 11540401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of an auxiliary magnification display on side-looking radar target recognition. AMRL-TR-67-134.
    Bate AJ; Self HC
    AMRL TR; 1968 May; ():1-36. PubMed ID: 5303689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clarity of flight information in the cockpit of the new aircraft generation].
    Stern C; Schwartz R; Groenhoff S; Draeger J; Hüttig G; Bernhard H
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Aug; 91(4):548-50. PubMed ID: 7950134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of eye movement and cognition during simulated landing of aircraft.
    Liu ZQ; Yuan XG; Liu W; Wang R
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2002 Oct; 15(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 12449149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Runway width effects in the visual approach to landing.
    Galanis G; Jennings A; Beckett P
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 2001; 11(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 11858256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target detection on side-looking radar when image motion can be temporarily delayed. AMRL-TR-67-23.
    Bate AJ; Self HC
    AMRL TR; 1967 Dec; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 5302884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Peculiarities of pilot's perception of flight information presented on on-board liquid crystal displays].
    Lemeshchenko NA; Ivanov AI; Lapa VV; Davydov VV; Zhelonkin VI; Riabinin VA; Golosov SIu
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2014; (11):36-40. PubMed ID: 25845149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent 3-D sonifications enable the head-up monitoring of two interrelated aircraft navigation instruments.
    Towers J; Burgess-Limerick R; Riek S
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1414-27. PubMed ID: 25509822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathway HUDs: are they viable?
    Fadden S; Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):173-93. PubMed ID: 11592660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-Flight Study of Helmet-Mounted Symbology System Concepts in Degraded Visual Environments.
    Cheung B; Craig G; Steels B; Sceviour R; Cosman V; Jennings S; Holst P
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2015 Aug; 86(8):714-22. PubMed ID: 26387895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
    Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulator motion as a factor in flight-director display evaluation.
    Jacobs RS; Williges RC; Roscoe SN
    Hum Factors; 1973 Dec; 15(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 4783187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
    Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.