These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6056803)

  • 21. CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION IN GOLDFISH AS A FUNCTION OF SHOCK-REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE.
    GELLER I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 14218288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of d-amphetamine on responding of squirrel monkeys maintained under second-order schedules of food presentation, electric shock presentation or stimulus-shock termination.
    Barrett JE; Katz JL; Glowa JR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 7264953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction, contrast, and resistance to extinction.
    Reynolds GS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jul; 11(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 5672253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learned helplessness: effects of response requirement and interval between treatment and testing.
    Hunziker MH; Dos Santos CV
    Behav Processes; 2007 Nov; 76(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17540513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.
    WERTHEIM GA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Sep; 8(5):269-78. PubMed ID: 14342362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behavioral effects of caffeine, N6-(L-phenylisopropyl) adenosine and their combination in the squirrel monkey.
    Glowa JR; Spealman RD
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1984 Dec; 231(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 6502521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding.
    Hake DF; Campbell RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):303-23. PubMed ID: 4624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding.
    Powell RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jan; 15(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 5547283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulation of rat behavior by a reinforcement learning algorithm in consideration of appearance probabilities of reinforcement signals.
    Murakoshi K; Noguchi T
    Biosystems; 2005 Apr; 80(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15740837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stability and variability in extinction.
    Neuringer A; Kornell N; Olufs M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11199517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Training of conditioned enhancement and conditioned suppression in rats.
    Walasek G; Zieliński K
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1987; 47(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 3604763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of medial septal lesions on action-outcome associations in rats under conditions of delayed reinforcement.
    Numan R; Ouimette AS; Holloway KA; Curry CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 118(6):1240-52. PubMed ID: 15598133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of chlordiazepoxide, buspirone and cocaine on behavior suppressed by timeout presentation.
    van Haaren F; Anderson KG
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):174-82. PubMed ID: 9833012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EXTINCTION AS A FUNCTION OF INTENSITY OF PUNISHMENT, AMOUNT OF TRAINING, AND REINFORCEMENT OF A COMPETING RESPONSE.
    BOE EE
    Can J Psychol; 1964 Dec; 18():328-42. PubMed ID: 14258396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of different subregions of the basolateral amygdala in cue-induced reinstatement and extinction of food-seeking behavior.
    McLaughlin RJ; Floresco SB
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jun; 146(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 17449185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CONDITIONED PUNISHMENT.
    HAKE DF; AZRIN NH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Sep; 8(5):279-93. PubMed ID: 14342363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of scopolamine on three different types of suppressed behavior of rats.
    McKim WA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Mar; 12(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 7393939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concurrent schedules of interresponse time reinforcement: probability of reinforcement and the lower bounds of the reinforced interresponse time intervals.
    Malott RW; Cumming WW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Jul; 9(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 5961500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out.
    McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Sep; 10(5):439-49. PubMed ID: 4963564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.