These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6060048)
1. Ipodate and the nonfunctioning gallbladder. Root HF Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1967 Nov; 101(3):621-4. PubMed ID: 6060048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. VARIATION IN SHAPE OF GALLBLADDER DURING CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY. THEANDER G Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1964; 225():SUPPL 225:1-75. PubMed ID: 14173745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gall-bladder contraction and bile duct opacification in oral cholecystography--a comparison of different methods. McConnell CA; Whitehouse GH; Evans AF Br J Radiol; 1983 Jun; 56(666):371-6. PubMed ID: 6342701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [STUDIES ON CORRELATION OF CHOLECYSTOCHOLANGIOGRAM TO OPERATIVE FINDINGS IN CHOLECYSTOPATHIA]. YOSHIDA M Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1963 Nov; 54():1185-207. PubMed ID: 14117887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of calcium Oragrafin granules in repeat cholecystography, with supplemental ultrasonographic evaluation. Fiske SA; Stamper DW J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1984 Mar; 83(7):512-5. PubMed ID: 6706718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate repeat cholecystography with oragrafin-calcium after initial nonvisualization of the gallbladder. Pogonowska MJ; Collins LC Radiology; 1969 Jul; 93(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 5801136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of common duct visualization in the oral cholecystogram without visible gall bladder. Sieniewicz DJ; Kiss J J Can Assoc Radiol; 1967 Dec; 18(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 6080023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of iocetamic acid and calcium ipodate in the visualisation of the gallbladder and common bile duct. Owen JP; Lavelle MI Clin Radiol; 1978 Sep; 29(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 152180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "nonvisualized" gallbladder. A tomographic re-evaluation. Meinick GS; Lo Curcio SB Radiology; 1973 Sep; 108(3):513-5. PubMed ID: 4723650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Present status of the use of contrast media in cholecystography]. Schindler G; Frommhold W Rontgenpraxis; 1982 May; 35(5):155-60. PubMed ID: 7046087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Common bile duct visualization with a nonvisualized gallbladder in oral cholecystography: radiological and surgical study. Katevuo K Diagn Imaging; 1979; 48(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 535519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [ON THE EARLY DEMONSTRATION OF THE GALLBLADDER AND THE BILE DUCTS AFTER ORAL AND RECTAL APPLICATION OF TRIIODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM]. ANDERSCH H; RICHTER K Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1964 Apr; 19():638-9. PubMed ID: 14204589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cholecystokinin cholecystography. A four year evaluation. Nathan MH; Newman A; Murray DJ; Camponovo R Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1970 Oct; 110(2):240-51. PubMed ID: 5472657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cholecystography to show the cystic and common bile ducts. HARROTT HM Radiography; 1954 Dec; 20(240):244-6. PubMed ID: 13215787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cholecystography of the gall bladder as a method of determination of "residual" bile]. Pekerman MIa Vrach Delo; 1966 May; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 5995514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Manometric choledochography during biliary surgery. Cuschieri A; Hughes JH; Cohen M Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1971 Jan; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 5572237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]