BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 606061)

  • 1. A comparison of the difficulty, reliability and validity of complex multiple choice, multiple response and multiple true-false items.
    Albanese MA; Kent TH; Whitney DR
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1977; 16():105-110. PubMed ID: 606061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
    Pamphlett R
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests.
    Kolstad RK; Wagner MJ; Kolstad RA
    J Dent Educ; 1985 Dec; 49(12):799-803. PubMed ID: 3864827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of multiple-choice examinations in surgery.
    Stillman RM
    Surgery; 1984 Jul; 96(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 6740501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
    Premadasa IG
    Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cuing effect of "all of the above" on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items.
    Harasym PH; Leong EJ; Violato C; Brant R; Lorscheider FL
    Eval Health Prof; 1998 Mar; 21(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 10183336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporation of core competency questions into an annual national self-assessment examination for residents in physical medicine and rehabilitation: results and implications.
    Webster JB
    PM R; 2009 Mar; 1(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 19627899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test performance of a local examination at a nonlocal site for evaluation of surgical clerks.
    Dunnington G; Witzke D; Hassett J; Reisner L; Fulginiti J; Rubeck R
    Surgery; 1990 Aug; 108(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 2382223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple choice questions revisited.
    Anderson J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 15203517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonrestricted multiple-choice examination items.
    Kolstad R; Goaz P; Kolstad R
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Aug; 46(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 6954178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining item difficulty and response time on perceptual ability test items.
    Yang CL; O'Neill TR; Kramer GA
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):282-99. PubMed ID: 12147914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults.
    Sabbahi DA; Lawrence HP; Limeback H; Rootman I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 19740249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How specific is case specificity?
    Norman G; Bordage G; Page G; Keane D
    Med Educ; 2006 Jul; 40(7):618-23. PubMed ID: 16836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping multiple dimensions of student learning: the ConstructMap program.
    Kennedy CA; Draney K
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19299881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.