These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6060815)

  • 1. Doctors in court.
    Br Med J; 1967 Dec; 4(5581):694. PubMed ID: 6060815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Professional secrecy and the right of the physician to refuse testimony].
    Wittenbeck S
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1971 Jul; 65(13):637-41. PubMed ID: 5116457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Refusal of medical expert. A critical observation].
    Stern M
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Mar; 111(12):673-7. PubMed ID: 5819272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doctors, defenses and the age of informed consent (second part).
    Ashe L
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1973 Mar; 65(3):49-54. PubMed ID: 4532567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The physician in criminal court].
    Durigon M
    Rev Prat; 2002 Apr; 52(7):743-5. PubMed ID: 12032961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of the law of medical practice. V. Medical evidence in court.
    Shindell S
    JAMA; 1965 Nov; 194(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 5897363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical privilege in English Law.
    Lancet; 1965 Oct; 2(7416):777-8. PubMed ID: 4157849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Professional secrecy.
    Br Med J; 1966 May; 1(5499):1313-4. PubMed ID: 5934372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Professional secrecy and what it implies.
    Fick GC
    S Afr Med J; 1969 Dec; 43(48):1462-6. PubMed ID: 5395776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Responsibility of the medical expert appointed by the court].
    Doll PJ
    Maroc Med; 1975 Apr; 55(589):183-93. PubMed ID: 1134124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lawyers out of hospitals, doctors out of court.
    Lumley J; Duncan C
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Sep; 80(5 Suppl):206-7. PubMed ID: 10343547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Medical jurisdiction in the literature 1970].
    Schulz G
    Med Klin; 1971 Jun; 66(23):860-7. PubMed ID: 4936730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical ethics and the expert physician].
    Vedrinne J
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1985 Jan; 105(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3975531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Surgery between law and conscience].
    Wachsmuth W
    Chirurg; 1976 Sep; 47(9):469-74. PubMed ID: 991691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Insurance companies and medical secrecy in court].
    Kornprobst L
    Nouv Presse Med; 1972 Mar; 1(11):753-6. PubMed ID: 5022257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicolegal aspects of ophthalmology. A symposium held in the Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, January 14th, 1972.
    Atrens JJ; MacKinnon DB; Simpson DG
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1974 Apr; 9(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 4837779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The health visitor in Court.
    Kendall P
    Health Visit; 1978 Apr; 51(4):126-8. PubMed ID: 246849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme court clarifies Alabama doctor-patient privilege statute.
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1974 Feb; 43(8):523-4. PubMed ID: 4812487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The chief physician has to give the expert testimony in person].
    Med Monatsschr; 1967 Apr; 21(4):192. PubMed ID: 5584449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychiatrists in court: the psychiatrist's view.
    Bromberg W
    Am J Psychiatry; 1969 Apr; 125(10):1343-7. PubMed ID: 5772922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.