These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Intrauterine devices "lost" in the abdomen. Apropos of 10 cases]. Chelli H; Bel Hadj A; Zouari Touhami F; Chelli M Tunis Med; 1984; 62(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 6396917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Experience with the use of Lippes' intrauterine device (report of observations of 10,512 female-months)]. Ruiz Moreno JA; Mateos Cándano M; Mejía Michel H; Gómez Huitrón G Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1972 Sep; 32(191):285-98. PubMed ID: 5074244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device. Ganer H; Levy A; Ohel I; Sheiner E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 201(4):381.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19716537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Intrauterine devices of a reduced size in nulliparous patients. Experience with Mini-Copper-7]. Calzolari E; Marziale G; Cersosimo L; Ciarrocchi F Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1983; 11(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 12339321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diseases of the lower abdomen due to intrauterine contraceptive device. David MP Int Surg; 1982; 67(4 Suppl):531-2. PubMed ID: 7183639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Natural history of contraceptive practice among postpartum loop acceptors. Wright NH Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Mar; 33(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 5776085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiographic assessment following insertion of 4 types of IUDs: geometric considerations and post-removal fertility. Ros A Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Apr; 1(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 12336240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD): socio-demographic characteristics of acceptors, acceptability and effectiveness in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Olatinwo AW; Anate M; Balogun OR; Alao MO Niger J Med; 2001; 10(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11705047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system. Delbarge W; Bátár I; Bafort M; Bonnivert J; Colmant C; Dhont M; Fonzé V; Gevers R; Janssens D; Lavalley P; Salmin E; Degueldre M; Vrijens M; Van Kets H; Wildemeersch D Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12041861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ectopic pregnancy in women who use intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Curcić A; Orelj M; Novakov A; Stojilković-Mikić T; Kapamadzija A Med Pregl; 1997; 50(5-6):212-4. PubMed ID: 9297053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Primary peritoneal pregnancy: a case report. Dasari P; Devi S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2000 Feb; 26(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 10761331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic localization of the ectopic intrauterine contraceptive device. Friedman PJ; Pine HL Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Jun; 27(6):814-9. PubMed ID: 5935434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The lippes loop. An intrauterine contraceptive device. Berger DL J Kans Med Soc; 1966 Dec; 67(12):591-2. PubMed ID: 5980204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [A case of intolerance to a contraceptive intrauterine device]. Konieczny A Wiad Lek; 1983 Dec; 36(23):1995-8. PubMed ID: 6675310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reappearance of the intrauterine device: a 'user-friendly' contraceptive. Kaunitz AM Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1997; 42(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 9160223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Heartwell SF; Schlesselman S Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 6823347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]