These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6061839)

  • 1. Canadian county-sponsored family planning. I. Organization.
    Tyson JE; Washburn HH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Dec; 30(6):869-74. PubMed ID: 6061839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canadian county-sponsored family planning. II. Twelve-month review.
    Tyson JE; Washburn HH; Tindale E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Dec; 30(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 6061840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrauterine devices. Their role in family planning care.
    WHO Offset Publ; 1983; (75):1-53. PubMed ID: 6637075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction of family planning legislation.
    Waxman HA
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Mar; 127(47):E1267. PubMed ID: 11652355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive health and AIDS-related services for women: how well are they integrated?
    Daley D
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(6):264-9. PubMed ID: 7867774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New York City's in-hospital family planning program.
    Daily EF; Sirey AR; Goodlet LS
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Jun; 2(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 5538309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
    Chamie M; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1988 Feb; 53(21):2922-46. PubMed ID: 10285637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meeting the needs of young people.
    IPPF Med Bull; 1984 Apr; 18(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12339509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population reports. Community-based health and family planning.
    Kols AJ; Wawer MJ; Quillin W; Kinsey J
    Popul Rep L; 1982; (3):L77-111. PubMed ID: 6761676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Family planning. Its pitfalls and administration.
    Crawford J
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1969 Nov; 96(11):640-7. PubMed ID: 5377565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast in cancer: Ontario versus Maryland.
    Lott S
    Md State Med J; 1976 Apr; 25(4):55-62. PubMed ID: 1271860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pharmacist and family planning: review and report of a study.
    Smith MC; Wetherbee H; Sharpe TR
    Am J Pharm; 1978; 150(5):152-9. PubMed ID: 12260649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
    Reitler EG
    Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Family Planning Program and cuts in federal spending. 2. Initial effects on the provision of services.
    Torres A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 6628640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Family Planning Program and cuts in federal spending. 1. Impact on state management of family planning funds.
    Orr MT
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 6354742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of federal funding for family planning.
    Crane PM; Roylance S
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Apr; 127(55):E1599-601. PubMed ID: 11655452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking men to family planning services.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Feb; 20(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 12294592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.
    Frost JJ; Finer LB; Tapales A
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):778-96. PubMed ID: 18677070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD; Samara R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.