These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6062230)
1. The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Williams LG Acta Psychol (Amst); 1967; 27():355-60. PubMed ID: 6062230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The organization of component decisions in visual search. Lehtiö PK Acta Psychol (Amst); 1970; 33():93-105. PubMed ID: 5445973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of texture-density preferences and motion parallax for visual depth discrimination by rats and chicks. Walk RD; Walters CP J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Feb; 86(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 4811556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. Ruff HA Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):293-306. PubMed ID: 679774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual form agnosia. A specific defect in visual discrimination. Benson DF; Greenberg JP Arch Neurol; 1969 Jan; 20(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 4303441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemispheric functional asymmetry in visual discrimination between univariate stimuli: an analysis of sensitivity and response criterion. Nichelli P; Spinnler H; Bisiach E Neuropsychologia; 1976; 14(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 958602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual search in complex fields: size differences between target disc and surrounding discs. Bloomfield JR Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 5022473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study of latent periods of visual object differentiation using various significant characteristics]. Zaĭtsev AV; Lupandin VI Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(4):38-42. PubMed ID: 11004748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scaling techniques in analysis of mode of responding by kindergarten children. Hunt D; Randhawa BS Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 4727985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination. Gilbert AL; Regier T; Kay P; Ivry RB Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 17628656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual receptive field organization of single units in the visual cortex of monkey. Spinelli DN; Pribram KH; Bridgeman B Int J Neurosci; 1970 Oct; 1(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 5005637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability. Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of curvature. Longden K; Ellis C; Iversen SD Neuropsychologia; 1976; 14(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 934453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Complexity as a determinant of visual field effects for random forms. Hannay HJ; Rogers JP; Durant RF Acta Psychol (Amst); 1976 Feb; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 1266650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The process of 'taking-into-account' in visual perception. Epstein W Perception; 1973; 2(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 4794124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in left and right visual fields. Ellis HD; Shepherd JW J Exp Psychol; 1974 Nov; 103(5):1035-6. PubMed ID: 4443759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]