These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6065842)
1. Generality of response intensity following nonreinforcement. Levine G; Loesch R J Exp Psychol; 1967 Sep; 75(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 6065842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Extinction of a runway response following noncontingent partial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in the goal box. Fitzgerald RD; Teyler TJ J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Jun; 65(3):542-4. PubMed ID: 5667402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of haloperidol on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): implications for neuroleptic drug action on reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Feldon J; Katz Y; Weiner I Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 95(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 2905502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resistance to extinction when continuous reinforcement is followed by partial reinforcement. Hothersall D J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jul; 72(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 5967714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of haloperidol on the multitrial partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): evidence for neuroleptic drug action on nonreinforcement but not on reinforcement. Feldon J; Weiner I Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 105(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 1686816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extinction performance as a function of N-R transitions and intertrial reinforcement with extended partial reinforcement training. Spivey JE; Hess DT; Klemic J Psychol Rep; 1968 Jun; 22(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 5653367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the difference in resistance to extinction following regular and periodic reinforcement. Schoenfeld WN J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 5660706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Extinction of a discrete-trial bar-press as a function of percentage reinforcement, reinforcement cue, and manipulandum condition. Porter JJ; Kopp R Psychol Rep; 1967 Oct; 21(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 6079228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of reinforcement aftereffects and level of training. Spivey JE; Hess DT; Aponte JF Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 5641242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of absolute amount, mean amount, and pattern of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction. Jernstedt GC J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 5665572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance after reinforcement and nonreinforcement in a partial reinforcement situation. McCain G Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):402. PubMed ID: 5912800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials. Uhl CN; Young AG J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 6034010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lesions of the nucleus accumbens disrupt reinforcement omission effects in rats. Judice-Daher DM; Bueno JL Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():439-43. PubMed ID: 23796973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response rate during x-irradiation and recovery following irradiation. Brown WL J Genet Psychol; 1966 Mar; 108(1st Half):117-20. PubMed ID: 5908838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Operant conditioning of the GSR using partial reinforcement. Greene WA Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 5912822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Paradoxical sleep increase triggered by learning, extinction and relearning of a response based on a positive reinforcement]. Hennevin E; Leconte P; Bloch V Brain Res; 1974 Apr; 70(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 4362599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential resistance to extinction determined by a small number of differential instrumental conditioning trials. Ison JR; Adinolfi AA J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):350-2. PubMed ID: 5655133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Social reinforcement of operant behavior in rats: a methodological note. Evans MJ; Duvel A; Funk ML; Lehman B; Sparrow J; Watson NT; Neuringer A J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 8064210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats. Beninger RJ Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Apr; 16(4):667-9. PubMed ID: 7071097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]