These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The vaccine dilemma. Kitch EW Issues Sci Technol; 1986; 2(2):108-21. PubMed ID: 11649683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DTP vaccine related injury: an examination of proposed vaccine injury compensation legislation. Murray PC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():233-51. PubMed ID: 11645601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The vaccine dilemma. Joyce RL; Johnson R; Smith MH; Davies A Issues Sci Technol; 1986; 2(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 11658798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vaccine issue foremost in clinical medicine. Busch L Am Med News; 1985 Jan; 28(1):13. PubMed ID: 11653614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Liability and compensation aspects of immunization injury: a call for reform. McIntosh WK Osgoode Hall Law J; 1980 Dec; 18(4):584-613. PubMed ID: 11658622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France. Kramnick RK Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Confronting a new obstacle to reproductive choice: encouraging the development of RU-486 through reform of products liability law. Rubin LA Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):131-59. PubMed ID: 11656168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Look-alike drugs and unfair competition. An update of Inwood Laboratories v. Ives Laboratories. Shapiro LJ Am Pharm; 1985 Oct; NS25(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 4061279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Food and Drug Administration and freedom of information. Radzius JR Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jan; 6(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 750805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When all benefit from immunization, who should pay for harms? Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Jun; 14(3):2. PubMed ID: 11644147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capping health insurance benefits for AIDS: an analysis of disability-based distinctions under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Eisenstat S J Law Polit; 1993; 10(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11654924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Too much law, too little justice. Tribe LH J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Sep; 99(3):578-83. PubMed ID: 288790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal alternatives to certification. Grad FP Am J Occup Ther; 1974 Jan; 28(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 4810048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS-based discrimination in the workplace: issues and answers. Kussner B Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1989; 47(2):383-419. PubMed ID: 11652617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Life forms: the law and the profits. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Oct; 8(5):21-2. PubMed ID: 721435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter: Costs and problems of de-leading. Tobin KN N Engl J Med; 1973 Nov; 289(21):1150. PubMed ID: 4754959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]