These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 607377)

  • 1. [Comparative evaluation of M.L. Cu. 250].
    van Os WA; Haspels AA; Rhemrev PE; Loendersloot EW; Lo Sin Sjoe E; de Nooyer CC
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Dec; 72(12):829-32. PubMed ID: 607377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of combined multiload copper IUD (MLCu250 and MLCu375).
    Van Os WA; De Nooyer CC; Bakker S; Bomert L; Rhemrev PE; Loendersloot EW
    Int J Fertil; 1978; 23(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 30726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Copper IUDs.
    Thiery M
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jul; 4(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 12265360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD].
    Elia D; Belaisch J
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The role of copper-releasing intrauterine device or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on uterine bleeding and iron status (prospective study of 8 years)].
    Imperato F; Perniola G; Mossa B; Marziani R; Perniola F; Stragapede B; Napolitano C
    Minerva Ginecol; 2002 Jun; 54(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 12063443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Six years' experience with the T Cu 220C intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Van Der Pas H; Thiery M; Delbeke L; Van Kets H; Haspels A
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Jan; 1(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12261713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Trutko NS
    Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200: immediate postpartum and interval insertion.
    Van Der Pas MT; Delbeke L; Van Dets H
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Jan; 1(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12261715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early experience with the copper 7, copper T220C and multiload 250 intrauterine devices.
    Goh TH; Tan CH; Lim SM; Chew SC; Hutapea H; Iskandar J
    Med J Malaysia; 1978 Jun; 32(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 732628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Larger amounts of copper correspond to greater contraceptive effectiveness. Experiments with the ML Cu 375, the IUD with the highest copper content].
    Van Os WA
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Jul; 80(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 4035197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Mode of action, experiences, complications (author's transl)].
    Ludwig H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Feb; 36(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 943359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Copper IUDs (author's transl)].
    Thiery M
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Oct; 11(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 12339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intra-uterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases.
    Das CR; Pradhan G
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1995 Oct; 93(10):375-6. PubMed ID: 9053409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with the Copper-7 and Copper-T intrauterine devices at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Koetsawang S; Srisupandit S; Bhiraleus P; Rachawat D; Kiriwat O; Jirochkul V; Mitra M; Thomas M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1982 Jan; 65(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 6153035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acceptability of the Copper 7, Multiload 250 and Copper T 220C intrauterine devices.
    Hutapea H; Mccarthy T; Goh TH; Hanafiah MJ; Simadjuntak P; Lim LS; Karim SM; Ratnam SS; Yong YM; Sinnathuray TA
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Jan; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12312739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Nova-T and Copper-T 200 in a five year's clinical comparison].
    Nygren KG; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Luukkainen T; Pyorala T
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Nov; 11(11):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12312701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.