259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6075717)
1. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in the Borough of Frederiksberg.
Koch F; Stakemann G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1967; 46():Suppl 9:77-84. PubMed ID: 6075717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on incidence and stage distribution of invasive cases.
Gad C
Dan Med Bull; 1976 May; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 949913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on mortality.
Gad C
Dan Med Bull; 1976 Dec; 23(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 1009799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: economic considerations.
Gad C; Ostergaard E
Dan Med Bull; 1977 Apr; 24(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 852314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of dispensary activity for the early diagnosis of genital carcinoma at the Ospedale Civile in Brescia].
Gastaldi A
Minerva Ginecol; 1968 Oct; 20(19):1573-6. PubMed ID: 5740787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive smears in previously screened patients (certain cytologic findings of public health importance).
Liu W
Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 5232017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Detection of cervical cancer at the Bell Telephone Company of Canada (1965-1969)].
Audet-Lapointe P
Union Med Can; 1972 Dec; 101(12):2713-6. PubMed ID: 4661704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mass screening for cancer combined with post-partum follow-up examination of the mothers].
Virkkunen E; Saloheimo A; Kauraniemi T; Valanne K
Suom Laakaril; 1966 May; 21(14):1227-31. PubMed ID: 5932830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for cancer of the female genital tract in general medical and surgical wards.
Wachtel E; Wycherley J; Lee CN
Practitioner; 1972 Apr; 208(246):505-8. PubMed ID: 5031038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Opportunities and procedures for the early diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix.
Jones HW; Davis HJ; Frost JK
Md State Med J; 1972 Mar; 21(3):54-8. PubMed ID: 5010908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Vaginal-cytological examination. Routine examination of a symptom-free young clientele].
Hastrup J; Rojel K
Ugeskr Laeger; 1968 Feb; 130(6):243-5. PubMed ID: 5676294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The frequency and importance of gynaecological screening in older women (author's transl)].
Kubista E; Nezbeda J
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 92(14):506-9. PubMed ID: 6933742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Part 1: Screening for cervical cancer.
Gollober M
Nurse Pract; 1977; 4(5):20, 24, 31. PubMed ID: 492615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: results of second and third rescreenings, 1966-1972.
Gad C; Koch F
Dan Med Bull; 1973 Oct; 20(5):141-3. PubMed ID: 4770766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Early diagnosis of cervix cancer based on the study of 10.000 cases].
Nemes J; Sági T
Orv Hetil; 1970 Apr; 111(14):788-94. PubMed ID: 5438634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of population screening on morbidity and mortality of cancer of the uterine cervix in Maribo Amt.
Berget A
Dan Med Bull; 1979 Apr; 26(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 436462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
