These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6077965)
1. The rod-and-frame box; a portable version of the rod-and-frame test. Morris JB Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Aug; 25(1):152. PubMed ID: 6077965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Field research model of the rod-and-frame test. Stuart IR; Murgatroyd D Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Apr; 32(2):671-4. PubMed ID: 5089101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual distortion as a function of stimulus objects, sex, naiveté, and trials using a portable model of the Ames distorted room. Gerace TA; Caldwell WE Genet Psychol Monogr; 1971 Aug; 84(1):3-33. PubMed ID: 5148686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A flexible apparatus for presenting pairs of visual stimuli to children. Thomas H J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Mar; 9(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 5907822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A pneumatic system for presenting visual stimuli. Daley MF; Alvord J; Lehner P J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Sep; 11(5):569-70. PubMed ID: 5722419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A system for the conversion of a slide projector into a visual discrimination apparatus. Maez AR; Graham ES; McVeán GW J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Sep; 11(5):575-7. PubMed ID: 5722421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A flexible instrument for presenting visual stimuli tachistoscopically. Farrimond T Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Jun; 26(3):Suppl:1236-8. PubMed ID: 5675693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of verticality on a modified portable Rod-and frame Test. Handel A Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 5021793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum repetitions for stable measures of visual dependency using the dot version of the computer-based Rod-Frame test. Takasaki H; Treleaven J; Johnston V; Jull G Man Ther; 2012 Oct; 17(5):466-9. PubMed ID: 22425587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of visual field dependence: comparison between the mechanical 3D rod-and-frame test developed by Oltman in 1968 with a 2D computer-based version. Isableu B; Gueguen M; Fourré B; Giraudet G; Amorim MA J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):239-47. PubMed ID: 19542598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex differences in undershoot with extended exposure time in the Rod-and-Frame test. Hayes RW; Venables PH Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):543-6. PubMed ID: 4824089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Field dependence and facial recognition. Hoffman C; Kagan S Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Feb; 44(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 840580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field-dependence, extraversion and perception of the vertical: empirical and theoretical perspectives of the rod-and-frame test. Fine BJ; Danforth AV Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):683-93. PubMed ID: 1178347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Buggywhips, whalebones, and clipboards: some notes on generating complex stimuli with small computers. Uttal WR Am Psychol; 1969 Mar; 24(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 5767568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple device for demonstrating Duncker's induced movement. Vetter RJ Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Aug; 21(1):177-8. PubMed ID: 5828374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Training monkeys by LINC-8 computer. Ettlinger G Cortex; 1970 Dec; 6(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 4998890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The simplest chronoscope II: reaction time measured by meterstick versus machine. Montare A Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Dec; 111(3):819-28. PubMed ID: 21319621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masking and visual field effects on a lateralized rod-and-frame test. Voyer D; Bryden MP Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 47(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8481710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]