These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6079649)

  • 1. The D4m measure.
    Snider JG
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Dec; 21(3):843-4. PubMed ID: 6079649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A differential semantic assay in order to measure aggressiveness.
    Remirez de Estenoz AM
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1982; Suppl 3(Pt 1):126-9. PubMed ID: 7183055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latitude of acceptance and the semantic differential.
    McCroskey JC
    J Soc Psychol; 1968 Feb; 74(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 5640244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A semantic differential scale for assessing group process changes.
    Hartley JA
    J Clin Psychol; 1968 Jan; 24(1):74. PubMed ID: 5639465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Scale position probabilities in the semantic differential].
    Piaggio L
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1968; 15(2):273-90. PubMed ID: 5709999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ["Unpleasant situations" in Osgood's semantic differential. An experimental validation of analytic and "hand" rotation of factors].
    DIRKZWAGER A
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1961; 16():433-43. PubMed ID: 13886562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Criteria and technics of the attribute section in the construction of a semantic differential].
    Fuchs A; Schäfer B
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1972; 124(4):282-302. PubMed ID: 4667951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methodological considerations in the assessment of similarities between trait adjectives: how to use the Semantic Differential technique (author's transl)].
    Prester HG; Etzel G
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1980; 133(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 7283691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Metric problems of the technic of semantic differentiation].
    Fuchs A
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1974; 126(2-4):114-24. PubMed ID: 4470995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blacky the cat, I: semantic differential ratings.
    Schaeffer DL
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Dec; 32(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 4881367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Empirical assessment of alexithymia using the semantic differential].
    Zepf S; Tschirch L
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1987 Jan; 37(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3562753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the semantic differential as instrument for measurement of attitudes.
    Marais HC
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Oct; 21(2):591-2. PubMed ID: 6079271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Representation of interactional configurations using process-accompanying semantic differentials].
    Geyer M; Plöttner G; Winiecki P
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1988 Jun; 38(6):211-7. PubMed ID: 3212170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is it that is being differentiated by the semantic differential?
    Miron MS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Jul; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 5803829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus properties of the Blacky to a sample of pedophiles.
    Stricker G
    J Gen Psychol; 1967 Jul; 77(1st Half):35-9. PubMed ID: 4862125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An index for measuring perceived stress in a college population.
    Jacobs PD; Munz DC
    J Psychol; 1968 Sep; 70():9-15. PubMed ID: 5680802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Personality assessment on the polarity profile].
    Revenstorff D
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1971 Dec; 123(3):195-216. PubMed ID: 5146756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theory and technique of the repertory grid.
    Slater P
    Br J Psychiatry; 1969 Nov; 115(528):87-96. PubMed ID: 5352671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The revised CMM as a test of perceived M-F and of self-report M-F.
    Sappenfield BR
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Feb; 32(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 4384189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summation vs. congruity in the prediction of affective responses to numerals.
    Brewer RE; Brewer MB
    J Gen Psychol; 1969 Apr; 80(2d Half):177-82. PubMed ID: 5787008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.