These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Extinction of food-reinforced instrumental behavior in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Buriticá J; Ortega LA; Papini MR; Gutiérrez G J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22866774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of cue stimulus in intermittent reinforcement training]. Takenaka H; Iwamoto T; Kurata M Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1967 Aug; 38(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 5625152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Excitotoxic lesions of the medial striatum delay extinction of a reinforcement color discrimination operant task in domestic chicks; a functional role of reward anticipation. Ichikawa Y; Izawa E; Matsushima T Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 15561503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resistance to extinction in the goldfish as a function of frequency and amount of reward. Gonzalez RC; Holmes NK; Bitterman ME Am J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 80(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 6055060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of relative and absolute reinforcement magnitude on operant responding. Campbell AB; Seiden LS Physiol Behav; 1974 May; 12(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 4837423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Extinction after regular and irregular reward schedules in the infant rat: influence of age and training duration. Lilliquist MW; Nair HP; Gonzalez-Lima F; Amsel A Dev Psychobiol; 1999 Jan; 34(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 9919433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning: a reinterpretation. Black RW Psychol Rev; 1968 Mar; 75(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 4870549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT. DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The experimental imperative: laboratory analyses of aggressive behaviors. Kelly DD Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis; 1974; 52():21-41. PubMed ID: 4154489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contingent delay versus noncontingent delay during acquisition and extinction. Clifford T; Birch D Psychol Rep; 1967 Feb; 20(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 6037792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules. Tullis C; Walters G J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 5645870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superstitious behavior in children: an experimental analysis. Zeiler MD Adv Child Dev Behav; 1972; 7():1-29. PubMed ID: 4577687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Some effects of non-reinforcement in split-brain monkeys. Johnson JD; Gazzaniga MS Physiol Behav; 1971 Jun; 6(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 5004622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hippocampal lesions and the partial reinforcement effect. Bloom JM; McFarlain RA Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):831-7. PubMed ID: 5124166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A delay is a delay is a delay. Clifford T; Mauldin JO Psychol Rep; 1967 Dec; 21(3):945-53. PubMed ID: 6079671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]