These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6080680)

  • 1. Qualitative versus directional cue in differential conditioning. II. Go-no go differentiation to cues of a mixed character.
    Szwejkowska G
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1967; 27(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 6080680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative versus directional cues in differential conditioning. I. Left leg-right leg differentiation to cues on a mixed character.
    Dobrzecka C; Konorski J
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1967; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 6080679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Qualitative versus directional cues in differential conditioning. IV. Left leg-right leg differentiation to non-directional cues.
    Dobrzecka C; Konorski J
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1968; 28(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 5706359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differing effectiveness of auditory quality and location cues in two forms of differentiation learning.
    Lawicka W
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1969; 29(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 5356940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative versus directional cues in differential conditioning. 3. The role of qualitative and directional cues in differentiation of salivary conditioned reflexes.
    Szwejkowska G
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1967; 27(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 6083359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Qualitative versus directional cues in two forms of differentiation.
    Dobrzecka C; Szejkowska G; Konorski J
    Science; 1966 Jul; 153(3731):87-9. PubMed ID: 5938425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial conditional discrimination learning in developing rats.
    Brown KL; Pagani JH; Stanton ME
    Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Mar; 46(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 15732054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The mechanism of visual cue discrimination in carp (Cyprinus carpio)].
    Lakimenko OO; Karas' AIa
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1974; 24(3):649-50. PubMed ID: 4450775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successive and conditional discrimination learning in pigs.
    Murphy E; Kraak L; Nordquist RE; van der Staay FJ
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Nov; 16(6):883-93. PubMed ID: 23525688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory discrimination learning by the chinchilla: comparison of go/no go and two-choice procedures.
    Burdick CK
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jan; 20(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7319992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right--left differentiation of instrumental grasping reactions to quantitative and directional cues. (Preliminary communication).
    Golda V
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1971; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 5551106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiation between same tone compound versus low-high tone compound in dogs.
    Corazyna H
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1967; 27(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 6080682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Formation of conditioned reflexes to number of sequential stimuli in the dog].
    Varga ME; Nikolaev GV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1983; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 6858386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The differences in learning abilities between spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar normotensive rats are cue dependent.
    Lukaszewska I; Niewiadomska G
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1995 Jan; 63(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 7663879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stronger renewal in human fear conditioning when tested with an acquisition retrieval cue than with an extinction retrieval cue.
    Vansteenwegen D; Vervliet B; Hermans D; Beckers T; Baeyens F; Eelen P
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Dec; 44(12):1717-25. PubMed ID: 16457776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
    Smith JD; Minda JP; Washburn DA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):398-414. PubMed ID: 15355146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of position and feature cues in discrimination learning by the whiptail lizard (Cnemidophorus inornatus).
    Day LB; Ismail N; Wilczynski W
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 117(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 14717646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: an fMRI study.
    Mok LW; Thomas KM; Lungu OV; Overmier JB
    Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 1265():111-27. PubMed ID: 19401182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of fimbria-fornix, hippocampus, and amygdala lesions on discrimination between proximal locations.
    Chai SC; White NM
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):770-84. PubMed ID: 15301603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The direction of change versus the absolute level of noise intensity as a cue in the CER situation.
    Zieliński K
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1965; 25(4):337-57. PubMed ID: 5887968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.