These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6080712)

  • 1. Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations. Ninetieth Congress, first session, S. 843. Full Opportunity and Social Accounting Act.
    Am Psychol; 1967 Nov; 22(11):977-1035. PubMed ID: 6080712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testimony before the senate A/Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations. Ninetieth Congress, first session, S. 836: a bill to create a National Foundation for the Social Sciences.
    Am Psychol; 1967 Nov; 22(11):915-69. PubMed ID: 6075375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testimony of Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986.
    Moore JA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 3786829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congress and social science.
    Brayfield AH
    Am Psychol; 1967 Nov; 22(11):877-8. PubMed ID: 4864633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rise and demise of the senate subcommittee on government research.
    Brezina DW
    Fed Proc; 1970; 29(5):1821-9. PubMed ID: 5457597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. science policy. Senate panel backs social sciences at NSF.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2006 May; 312(5777):1117. PubMed ID: 16728601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. U.S. science policy. Senate panel chair asks why NSF funds social sciences.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):829. PubMed ID: 16690827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. United States Department of Agriculture statement of Assistant Secretary for Science and Education before the House Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology and Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agricultural Research and Environment.
    Bentley OG
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 3786830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testimony of the American Society for Microbiology before the House Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, House Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the House Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the House Committee on Science and Technology. Hearing on "The coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology", July 23, 1986.
    Riley M
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 3466239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary. June 7-10, 1965, Washington, D. C.
    Brayfield AH
    Am Psychol; 1965 Nov; 20(11):888-954. PubMed ID: 4378564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of the U.S. Congress in setting goals and priorities for research on nutrition and aging.
    Schaefer M
    Aging (Milano); 1993 Apr; 5(2 Suppl 1):71-5. PubMed ID: 8399453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testimony before House Special Subcommittee on Invasion of Privacy of the Committee on Government Operations. June 2, 3, 4, 7, 23, 1965, Washington, D. C.
    Gallagher CE
    Am Psychol; 1965 Nov; 20(11):955-88. PubMed ID: 5831177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the Committee on Science and Technology, June 23, 1986.
    Mellon MG
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 3466240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statement by the American Society for Medcial Technology in consideration of the proposed recombinant DNA legislation: submitted to the Senate Subcommittee on Health of the Human Resource Committee and to the House Subcommittee on Health of the Interstate Foreign Commerce Committee. September 7, 1977.
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 Jan; 44(1):66. PubMed ID: 623146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. USA government and family planning.
    Landman LC
    IPPF Med Bull; 1972 Aug; 6(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12306202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Academy opposes local DNA research rules.
    Sci Gov Rep; 1977 May; 7(9):8. PubMed ID: 11662382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.