These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6080837)

  • 1. Effects of differential instructions, differential feedback, and UCS intensity on the conditioned-eyelid response.
    Fishbein HD
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Sep; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 6080837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EFFECTS OF CS AND UCS CHANGE ON EXTINCTION OF THE CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE.
    PRICE LE; ABBOTT DW; VANDAMENT WE
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():437-8. PubMed ID: 14286317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UCS intensity and the latency of the classically conditioned eyelid response.
    Suboski MD
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 May; 74(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 6032573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supplementary report: yoked comparisons of classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning under 3 UCS intensities.
    GORMEZANO I; MOORE JW; DEAUX E
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Nov; 64():551-2. PubMed ID: 13949313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of differential instructions, differential payoffs, and the presence or absence of feedback on the percentage, latency, and amplitude of the conditioned eyelid response.
    Fishbein HD; Gormezano I
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 5909079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONS UPON EYELID CONDITIONING.
    NICHOLLS MF; KIMBLE GA
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():400-2. PubMed ID: 14165657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyelid trace conditioning, CS intensity, CS-UCS interval, and a correction for "spontaneous" blinking.
    Lipkin SG; Moore JW
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 72(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 5966620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. INTERTRIAL RESPONDING AND CS INTENSITY IN CLASSICAL EYELID CONDITIONING.
    MATTSON M; MOORE JW
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Oct; 68():396-401. PubMed ID: 14216498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response in the squirrel monkey as functions of the CS-UCS interval.
    Pennypacker HS; Cook WA
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Jun; 20(3):Suppl:1235-43. PubMed ID: 4966217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EFFECTS OF READY SIGNAL CONDITION ON ACQUISITION AND EXTINCTION OF THE CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE.
    PRICE LE; VANDAMENT WE; ABBOTT DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Nov; 68():516-8. PubMed ID: 14212140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration with drive equated.
    Dufort RH
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jul; 74(3):321-3. PubMed ID: 6059388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.
    PROKASY WF; EBEL HC; THOMPSON DD
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():138-41. PubMed ID: 13986323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EFFECT OF A READY SIGNAL ON THE LATENCY OF VOLUNTARY RESPONSES IN EYELID CONDITIONING.
    GOODRICH KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 May; 67():496-8. PubMed ID: 14171911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EFFECT OF A READY SIGNAL ON THE LATINCY OF VOLUNTARY RESPONSES EN EYELID CONDITIONING.
    GOODRICH KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 May; 67():496-8. PubMed ID: 14171244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential eyelid conditioning under equated drive as a function of reinforcing UCS.
    SPENCE KW; TANDLER BF
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jan; 65():35-8. PubMed ID: 13990005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF CS INTENSITY, UCS INTENSITY, AND MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE SCORE.
    BECK SB
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Nov; 66():429-38. PubMed ID: 14081996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HUMAN-EYELID CONDITIONING: THE RECENT EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE.
    ROSS LE; HARTMAN TF
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1965 Feb; 71():177-220. PubMed ID: 14279692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of differential instructions and number of acquisition trials on extinction and reacquisition of the conditioned-eyelid response.
    Fishbein HD
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Sep; 75(1):126-7. PubMed ID: 6065826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The law of effect and the origin of the classically conditioned eyelid response.
    Suboski MD; Greenner RT; Pappas P
    Can J Psychol; 1967 Oct; 21(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 6065716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UCS INTENSITY AND THE ASSOCIATIVE STRENGTH OF THE EYELID CR WITH A MASKED CONDITIONING PROCEDURE.
    HOMZIE MJ; WEISS G
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():101-3. PubMed ID: 14256240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.