These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6081922)

  • 1. The effect of cue relevance, ambiguity, and self-reported hostility on TAT responses.
    Kaplan MF
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Dec; 31(6):45-50. PubMed ID: 6081922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of time pressure on the management of aggression in TAT stories.
    Fiester S; Siipola E
    J Pers Assess; 1972 Jun; 36(3):230-40. PubMed ID: 5031347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hostility on the TAT as a function of defensive inhibition and stimulus situation.
    Megargee EI
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Aug; 31(4):73-9. PubMed ID: 4383008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hostility of asocial youth as measured by the TAT and Rorschach.
    Kalliopuska M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Apr; 74(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 1594417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between behavioral indices of aggression and hostile content on the TAT.
    Matranga JT
    J Pers Assess; 1976 Apr; 40(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 957083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex differences in TAT ambiguity, hostility, and projection.
    Murstein BI
    J Genet Psychol; 1966 Mar; 108(1st Half):71-80. PubMed ID: 5908847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expression of TAT hostility as a function of self-reported hostility, arousal, and cue characteristics.
    Kaan MF
    J Pers; 1969 Jun; 37(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 5787860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PROJECTION OF HOSTILITY ON THE TAT AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS, BACKGROUND, AND PERSONALITY VARIABLES.
    MURSTEIN BI
    J Consult Psychol; 1965 Feb; 29():43-8. PubMed ID: 14277397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of stimulus, background, personality, and scoring system on the manifestation of hostility on the TAT.
    Murstein BI
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1968 Jun; 32(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 5666134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of female aggressiveness on aggressive and sexual fantasies.
    Barclay AM
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1970 Feb; 34(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 5414423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TAT hostility and Buss hostility scale.
    MURSTEIN BI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1963 Apr; 16():520. PubMed ID: 13936796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of aggressive and nonaggressive rock songs on projective and structured tests.
    Wanamaker CE; Reznikoff M
    J Psychol; 1989 Nov; 123(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 2607484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hostility content analysis of Rorschach and TAT.
    HAFNER AJ; KAPLAN AM
    J Proj Tech; 1960 Jun; 24():137-43. PubMed ID: 13830850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. THEMATIC HOSTILITY AND GUILT RESPONSES AS RELATED TO SELFREPORTED HOSTILITY, GUILT, AND CONFLICT.
    SALTZ G; EPSTEIN S
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1963 Nov; 67():469-79. PubMed ID: 14081890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measures of aggression in questionnaire ratings and stories from the Apperceptive Personality Test.
    Condrell C; Karp SA; Holmstrom RW; Silber DE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1187-91. PubMed ID: 9700791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social desirability and the type of hostility expressed on the TAT.
    REZNIKOFF M; DOLLIN A
    J Clin Psychol; 1961 Jul; 17():315-7. PubMed ID: 13741131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of hostility in the TAT as a function of defensive style.
    O'Gorman JG; Stair LH
    J Pers Assess; 1977 Dec; 41(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 592087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scaling of the TAT for hostility by a variety of scaling methods.
    MURSTEIN BI; DAVID C; FISHER D; FURTH HG
    J Consult Psychol; 1961 Dec; 25():497-504. PubMed ID: 14477501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EGO-SUPPORT, COMMUNICATION, CATHARSIS, AND HOSTILITY.
    ROTHAUS P; WORCHEL P
    J Pers; 1964 Jun; 32():296-312. PubMed ID: 14155504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hostility themes in the family TAT.
    Winter WD; Ferreira AJ; Olson JL
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Jun; 30(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 5943385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.