BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6093204)

  • 1. [Possibilities and limitations of the differential diagnosis of grouped intramammary microcalcifications].
    Lanyi M; Neufang KF
    Rofo; 1984 Oct; 141(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 6093204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease.
    Hansell DM; Cooke JC; Parsons CA; Evans SH; Dance DR; Bliss JM; Llesley I
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):21-5. PubMed ID: 2832028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Needle localization and biopsy in non-palpable lesions of the breast: an eight-year experience.
    Laraja RD; Rothenberg RE; Herbert L; Pryce EH
    N Y State J Med; 1992 Feb; 92(2):71. PubMed ID: 1314357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The differential diagnosis of microcalcification. Micro-cyst (blunt duct) adenosis (author's transl)].
    Lanyi M; Citoler P
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 6260608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
    Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The differential diagnostic criteria of breast microcalcifications].
    Ciatto S; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 1318560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An analysis of 136 groups of microcalcification of benign origin. How specific is the "triangle principle" (author's transl)].
    Lanyi M
    Rofo; 1982 Feb; 136(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 6284610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography and the primary care management of breast lumps.
    Banerjee A; Burke M
    Practitioner; 1989 May; 233(1468):652-5. PubMed ID: 2557602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [X-ray morphologic characteristics of microcalcination in benign processes and cancer of the breast].
    Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 2546321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radiological aspects of breast carcinoma].
    Willemin A
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Jun; 68(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17474648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic detection of carcinoma of the breast in patients with augmentation prostheses.
    Mitnick JS; Harris MN; Roses DF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jan; 168(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 2535767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digitization of microcalcifications in breast radiographs. Correlation with pathologic data.
    Charpin C; Allasia C; Davies JD; Devictor B; Boulat J; Ansaldi JL; Lavaut MN; Serradour B; Andrac L; Piana L
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 8526947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Hermann DG; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 2845470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of non-palpable mammographic changes of the breast].
    Diergarten K; Kessler U; Eiermann W
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 245(1-4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2552940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
    Stomper PC; Connolly JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 1309620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Milk of calcium within tiny benign breast cysts.
    Sickles EA; Abele JS
    Radiology; 1981 Dec; 141(3):655-8. PubMed ID: 7302218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation of numerically detected microcalcifications on the mammogram and in this manner diagnosed carcinomas and mastopathies].
    Menges V; Wellauer J; Engeler V; Stadelmann R
    Radiologe; 1973 Nov; 13(11):468-76. PubMed ID: 4360451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls in mammography screening policy: breast cancer in a 26-year-old patient.
    Castelo-Branco C; Gratacós E; Fernandez PL; Velasco M; Iglesias X; Fortuny A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8387938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.