These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6106596)

  • 1. Postpartum and postabortion use of the TCu-220C and Lippes Loop: A comparative study.
    Sobrevilla LA; Quintero AG; Bailey J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 6106596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IUD insertion following termination of pregnancy: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Lippes loop D, and copper 7.
    Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Apr; 14(4):99-108. PubMed ID: 6351364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative multicentre trial of three IUDs inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta.
    Contraception; 1980 Jul; 22(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 7418410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative study on the effectiveness of Copper T 200 and Lippes Loop in rural community (author's transl)].
    Kim KS; Yang YH; Chung SH
    Kajok Kyehoek Nonjip; 1975 Jun; 2():51-63. PubMed ID: 12178450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interval iud insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220c and the Copper 7.
    Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 7128130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of delta intrauterine devices in Ankara, Turkey.
    Kisnisci H; Champion CB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1985 Feb; 23(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2860033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IUD insertion following spontaneous abortion: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Liuppes loop D, and copper 7.
    Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Apr; 14(4):109-14. PubMed ID: 6351363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia.
    Sastrawinata S; Farr G; Prihadi SM; Hutapea H; Anwar M; Wahyudi I; Sunjoto ; Kemara KP; Champion CB; Robbins M
    Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 1893708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the Lippes Loop and two copper-bearing intrauterine devices.
    Cole LP; Edelman DA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 6106597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four years' experience with the TCu 220C, a long-acting multisleeved copper intrauterine device.
    Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Van Kets H; Boogers W; Haspels A; Amy J-j
    Adv Plan Parent; 1979; 14(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12335870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modification of the CuT 220C for immediate postpartum use.
    Laufe LE; Cole LP; Wheeler RG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):151-2. PubMed ID: 7189329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative clinical experience with 3 IUDs, TCu 380 Ag, TCu 220C and Mahua ring, in Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
    Shih S; Li-Juan Q; Xuan L
    Contraception; 1984 Mar; 29(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 6734209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the copper T-200 and the Lippes Loop in four countries.
    Sivin I
    Stud Fam Plann; 1976 Apr; 7(4):115-23. PubMed ID: 936260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of continuation rates of intrauterine devices.
    Measham AR; Villegas A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 948377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate post-abortal insertion of intrauterine devices.
    Grimes D; Schulz K; Stanwood N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001777. PubMed ID: 10796820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The introduction of postpartum intrauterine devices in the People's Republic of China.
    Wen ZS; Lin L; Laufe LE; Dixon B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Apr; 21(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6136435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multicenter randomized comparative investigation of ML Cu250, TCu-220C and Cu7 IUDs.
    Goh TH; Hutapea H; Mccarthy T; Sinnathuray TA; Sivanesaratnam V; Sen DK; Nanafiah MJ; Simadjuntak P; Lim LS; Ratnam SS
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1985; (1):126-30. PubMed ID: 12267108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.