These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6106597)

  • 1. A comparison of the Lippes Loop and two copper-bearing intrauterine devices.
    Cole LP; Edelman DA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 6106597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia.
    Randic L; Haller H; Perovic M; Farr G
    Contraception; 1991 Mar; 43(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2036794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postpartum and postabortion use of the TCu-220C and Lippes Loop: A comparative study.
    Sobrevilla LA; Quintero AG; Bailey J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 6106596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval iud insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220c and the Copper 7.
    Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 7128130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the copper T-200 and the Lippes Loop in four countries.
    Sivin I
    Stud Fam Plann; 1976 Apr; 7(4):115-23. PubMed ID: 936260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of continuation rates of intrauterine devices.
    Measham AR; Villegas A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 948377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Trutko NS
    Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparison between the Multiload Cu 250 and the Lippes loop intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Theron F
    S Afr Med J; 1980 Jul; 58(2):64-5. PubMed ID: 7404184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A three-year evaluation of TCu 380 Ag and multiload Cu 375 intrauterine devices.
    Champion CB; Behlilovic B; Arosemena JM; Randic L; Cole LP; Wilkens LR
    Contraception; 1988 Dec; 38(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 3219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study of the acceptability of inert and copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Manuilova IA; Dubnitskaia LV
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1988 Nov; (11):47-50. PubMed ID: 3239684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IUD insertion following termination of pregnancy: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Lippes loop D, and copper 7.
    Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Apr; 14(4):99-108. PubMed ID: 6351364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart Delta devices--an epidemiological analysis.
    Chi IC; Wilkens L; Rogers S
    Contraception; 1985 Aug; 32(2):119-34. PubMed ID: 3907964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T].
    Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of delta intrauterine devices in Ankara, Turkey.
    Kisnisci H; Champion CB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1985 Feb; 23(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2860033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Return of fertility after the removal of intrauterine devices: a comparison of inert and copper bearing devices.
    Anwar M; Widayanto S; Maruo T; Mochizuki M
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 19(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 8489473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.