These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6114763)

  • 1. The constitutional right to refuse antipsychotic medications.
    Brooks AD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(2):179-221. PubMed ID: 6114763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of institutionalized mental health patients' right to refuse psychotropic drugs.
    Kemna DJ
    J Leg Med; 1985 Mar; 6(1):107-38. PubMed ID: 2860193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication.
    Arkin HR
    JAMA; 1983 May; 249(20):2784-5. PubMed ID: 6133017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Rotting with their rights on": constitutional theory and clinical reality in drug refusal by psychiatric patients.
    Appelbaum PS; Gutheil TG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 549703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment.
    Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of involuntary treatment.
    Hassenfeld IN
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The treatment review panel: a solution to treatment refusal?
    Zito JM; Lentz SL; Routt WW; Olson GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 6151858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: preliminary empirical findings and comparisons.
    Hoge SK; Gutheil TG; Kaplan E
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2893647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of the right to refuse treatment.
    Hassenfeld IN; Grumet B
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 6713106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guardianship and the right to refuse treatment: a critique of the Roe case.
    Mills MJ; Gutheil TG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 6124289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
    Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One right too many.
    Rachlin S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 1231947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some empirical findings on the right to refuse treatment.
    Carter JH
    N C Med J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):108, 113. PubMed ID: 6573573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right to refuse antipsychotic medication: who decides?
    Zajc M
    Med Law; 1987; 6(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 2883550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the competence of people to consent to medical treatment: a balance between law and medicine.
    Hoffman BF
    Med Law; 1990; 9(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 2126838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.
    Bursztajn H; Chanowitz B; Kaplan E; Gutheil TG; Hamm RM; Alexander V
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 1685680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Boston State Hospital case: "involuntary mind control," the constitution, and the "right to rot".
    Appelbaum PS; Gutheil TG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 137(6):720-3. PubMed ID: 7377395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.