These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. On the journey to competency-based assessment for safe patient care. Jünger J; Tekian A; Norcini JJ GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc47. PubMed ID: 26483860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Should medical student assessment be by standards or by rank? Fontaine S; Wilkinson TJ N Z Med J; 2001 Jul; 114(1135):314-5. PubMed ID: 11556446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Ways to increase the effectiveness of the training in pediatrics]. D'iachenko VG; Suleĭmanov SSh Pediatriia; 1991; (1):73-6. PubMed ID: 2041702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Objective structured clinical evaluation should not only be a test of clinical skill. Chan WP Ann Acad Med Singap; 2008 Nov; 37(11):979. PubMed ID: 19082208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Competency-based training: who benefits? Brightwell A; Grant J Postgrad Med J; 2013 Feb; 89(1048):107-10. PubMed ID: 23019588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Medical education assessment: a brief overview of concepts in generalizability theory. Tavakol M; Brennan RL Int J Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 4():221-222. PubMed ID: 28035055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Surgery and medical education. Present and future]. Carrasco Rojas JA Cir Cir; 2014; 82(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 25238464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Medicine in the USA: historical vignettes. XX. The Flexner report of 1910. King LS JAMA; 1984 Feb; 251(8):1079-86. PubMed ID: 6363738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Psychiatry clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination is here to stay. Vaidya NA Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 18467471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Reasonable adjustments for clinical examinations: process and solutions. Williams R; Demery R; Davies R; Harding J Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 53(11):1148-1149. PubMed ID: 31650604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Team OSCEs: evaluation methodology or educational encounter? Marshall D; Hall P; Taniguchi A Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1129-30. PubMed ID: 18991985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Envisioning Transformations in Medical Education. Gingrich D; Leong SL; Thompson B; Kent J Md Med; 2016; 17(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 27443125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessing doctors at work--progress and challenges. Klass D N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):414-5. PubMed ID: 17251540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. How not to effect change in curricula. Koczwara B; Barton MB; Tattersall MH; Turner DR; Olver IN; Starmer DL Med J Aust; 2006 Jul; 185(1):52. PubMed ID: 16813553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Is an evaluation required at the third cycle?]. Meder JF; Dacher JN; Krausé D J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):927-8. PubMed ID: 17878847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Contribution of basic medical science to a new medical curriculum. McCrorie P Biochem Soc Trans; 1993 May; 21(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 8359501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Attention to gender in communication skills assessment instruments in medical education: a review. Dielissen P; Bottema B; Verdonk P; Lagro-Janssen T Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 21299599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Medical education: time for change--yes--but... Pellegrino ED J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3 Suppl():55S-63S. PubMed ID: 2363373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]