BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6120391)

  • 1. Intrauterine contraceptive devices in diabetic women.
    Gosden C; Steel J; Ross A; Springbett A
    Lancet; 1982 Mar; 1(8271):530-5. PubMed ID: 6120391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of material adherent to intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Feb; 87(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 7362803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The response of endometrial blood vessels to intrauterine contraceptive devices: an electron microscopic study.
    Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Feb; 87(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 7362802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine contraceptive devices for diabetics.
    Kurz KH; Berger M
    Lancet; 1982 Sep; 2(8300):707. PubMed ID: 6126638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the cervix by actinomyces-like organisms.
    Mao K; Guillebaud J
    Contraception; 1984 Dec; 30(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 6529911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degradation of the copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device and its significance.
    Chantler EN; Scott K; Filho CI; Elstein M; Faragher EB; Lorimer GW; Brough I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Feb; 91(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 6696861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electron microscopic and chemical study of the deposits formed on the copper and inert IUCDs.
    Rizk M; Shaban N; Medhat I; Moby el Dien Y; Ollo MA
    Contraception; 1990 Dec; 42(6):643-53. PubMed ID: 2083487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
    Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in diabetics.
    Craig GM
    Br J Sex Med; 1982 Feb; 9():44-8. PubMed ID: 12279278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of surface deposits on intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Yuan WR
    Shengzhi Yu Biyun; 1983 Aug; 3(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 12267397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calcareous deposits formed on IUDs in human exposures.
    Johnson AB; Maness RF; Wheeler RG
    Contraception; 1976 Nov; 14(5):507-17. PubMed ID: 975833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copper loss from the copper T model TCu22OC.
    Thiery M; Schmidt F; Tatum HJ
    Contraception; 1982 Sep; 26(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7172675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuing IUD research.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1981 Jan; 2(2):4. PubMed ID: 12339100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concentrations of copper in human secretions and weight of the copper wire during the 4 to 7 years after insertion of a Cu-IUD (intrauterine device).
    Larsson B; Frankman O; Hamberger L
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Dec; 36(6):734-6. PubMed ID: 7308517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
    Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do plain plastic and copper bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices have a central mechanism of action?
    Goldstuck ND
    Med Hypotheses; 1987 Jun; 23(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 2956487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between OM-GA Cu and Copper-T IUCDs.
    Confino E; Ismajovich B; Rudick A; Yedwab G; David MP
    Contraception; 1983 Dec; 28(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 6370586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.