These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 612223)

  • 1. Applanation tonometer correlations.
    Soni PS
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Dec; 54(12):834-6. PubMed ID: 612223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas.
    McMillan F; Forster RK
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Jun; 93(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 805582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas.
    Rootman DS; Insler MS; Thompson HW; Parelman J; Poland D; Unterman SR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Dec; 106(12):1697-700. PubMed ID: 3058102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats.
    Miller PE; Pickett JP; Majors LJ; Kurzman ID
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Nov; 52(11):1917-21. PubMed ID: 1785739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia.
    Olson PF; McDonald MB; Werblin TP; Kaufman HE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1983 Jul; 101(7):1111-2. PubMed ID: 6347151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparative pressure studies with Goldmann; Mackay-Marg and pneumatic applanation tonometers.
    Jain MR; Marmion VJ
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1977 Oct; 25(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 614270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microprocessor controlled tonometry.
    Draeger J; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():738-42. PubMed ID: 2630355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the Cavitron Biotronics tonometer to the Goldmann tonometer.
    Barron C; Horn D
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Nov; 61(11):698-703. PubMed ID: 6517128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical value of new tonometers].
    Schwartz R; Draeger J; Wirt H; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2323695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of applanation tonometers for the dog eye.
    Gelatt KN; Peiffer RL; Gum GG; Gwin RM; Erickson JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1977 Oct; 16(10):963-8. PubMed ID: 908649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical comparison of the Tono-Pen tonometer to the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Jiang B; Jiang Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 18(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 15515766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations.
    Shields MB
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1980; 24(4):211-9. PubMed ID: 6987761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Cavitron Biotronics tonometer.
    Miller K; Sanborn GE; Jennings LW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1210-3. PubMed ID: 3046584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Priehs DR; Gum GG; Whitley RD; Moore LE
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
    Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.