These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Invasive cervical cancer and intrauterine device use. Lassise DL; Savitz DA; Hamman RF; Barón AE; Brinton LA; Levines RS Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 20(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 1800424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Prevention of pregnancy by using intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Toĭvonen Iu Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Dec; (12):53-4. PubMed ID: 2090000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The IUD and pelvic infection. Ziff RA Am Fam Physician; 1981 Dec; 24(6):109-13. PubMed ID: 7197874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device. Daling JR; Weiss NS; Metch BJ; Chow WH; Soderstrom RM; Moore DE; Spadoni LR; Stadel BV N Engl J Med; 1985 Apr; 312(15):937-41. PubMed ID: 3974683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative study of the nylon T and copper T 200. Andolsek L; Kozuh-novak M; Waszak C Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Sep; 4(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 12265805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Value of intrauterine contraception]. Neumann HG Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1985; 79(10):449-51. PubMed ID: 4049935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of the copper intrauterine device versus injectable progestin contraception on pregnancy rates and method discontinuation among women attending termination of pregnancy services in South Africa: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Hofmeyr GJ; Singata-Madliki M; Lawrie TA; Bergel E; Temmerman M Reprod Health; 2016 Apr; 13():42. PubMed ID: 27091008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The acceptability of current contraceptive methods to adolescents]. Sotnikova EI; Dubnitskaia LV; Perminova SG Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (3):26-30. PubMed ID: 8048682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Expanding contraceptive options. Family Health International FHI Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1989; 11(1):3-5, 16. PubMed ID: 12283021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized comparison of multiload standard and short devices. Kivijarvi A Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Sep; 4(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 12265803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical aspects of contraception by means of copper-7 and copper-T intrauterine devices]. Peksa A; Sternadel Z Ginekol Pol; 1978 Sep; 49(9):781-5. PubMed ID: 730064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, Gravigard and TCu 220C IUDs. Mccarthy TG; Lim LS; Chew SC; Heng SH; Ratnam SS Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1985; (1):113-21. PubMed ID: 12267106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Removal from the abdominal cavity of an intrauterine device by culdoscopy]. Acosta Bendek E Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 28(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 565069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]