756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6128038)
1. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of legal rhetoric in a clinical setting: advocating the advocates.
Kraft PB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 4074896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal aspects of psychiatry in the Soviet Union.
Babayan EA
Psychiatr Ann; 1978 Jan; 8(1):37/78+. PubMed ID: 11662651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: preliminary empirical findings and comparisons.
Hoge SK; Gutheil TG; Kaplan E
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2893647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Competency determinations.
Beck JC
Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Oct; 145(10):1325-6. PubMed ID: 3421374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of empathy in forensic examinations.
Shuman DW
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When treatment becomes coercion: a legal perspective.
Einhorn AH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():199-208. PubMed ID: 6930899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What constitutes a psychiatric emergency: clinical and legal dimensions.
Swartz MS
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 3427231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guardianship and the right to refuse treatment: a critique of the Roe case.
Mills MJ; Gutheil TG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 6124289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. To stay at home: analysis of rights and recommendations on procedures for persons receiving mental health services in the community.
Lowder JL; Hickman FJ
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 11652820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Queensland's Mental Health Court: the first 12 months.
Lawrence JM
Health Law Can; 2004 Apr; 24(3):47-59. PubMed ID: 15192939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Consultation of the medical expert in dispensation of safety detention (paragraphs 80 a, 246 a Criminal Code)].
Kaatsch HJ
Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1984; 42():5-8. PubMed ID: 6477451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment.
Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG
Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicine court: Rogers in practice.
Veliz J; James WS
Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 3799842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law.
Faulkner LR
J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The treatment review panel: a solution to treatment refusal?
Zito JM; Lentz SL; Routt WW; Olson GW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 6151858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
