756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6128038)
21. Consequences of involuntary treatment.
Hassenfeld IN
Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Legal rights of mental patients.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Mar; 53(5):49-52, 92. PubMed ID: 759339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Involuntary hospitalization--medical or judicial authority.
Sigal M
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1994; 31(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 7875949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Management of forensic psychiatry patients who refuse medication--two scenarios.
Rodenhauser P; Heller A
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Jan; 29(1):237-44. PubMed ID: 6699594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Minnesota Advance Psychiatric Directive. Protecting patient decision making.
Dixon G
Minn Med; 1992 Dec; 75(12):33-4. PubMed ID: 1361651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The ethical dilemmas of forensic psychiatry: a utilitarian approach.
Halleck SL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 6478070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Power imbalances in therapeutic and forensic relationships.
Perlin ML
Behav Sci Law; 1991; 9(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 11645719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Civil commitment: a review of traditional arrangements in the provision of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
Strong HR
Can J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 28(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 6871819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Law and the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights.
Weiner BA
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Synthetic competence and consent. Ought a defendant be drugged to stand trial?
Graber GC; Marsh FH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 34567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical issues in the representation of individuals in the commitment process.
Perlin ML; Sadoff RL
Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):161-92. PubMed ID: 11645494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem.
Zemishlany Z; Melamed Y
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8. PubMed ID: 17294980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Council on Psychiatry and Law.
Roth LH
Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 143(3):412-3. PubMed ID: 11643912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Civil commitment of minors to mental institutions in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Hopcroft T
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1995; 21(2):543-74. PubMed ID: 11660369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Has the Pennsylvania legislature over-reacted in setting standards for involuntary commitment of mentally ill persons.
Rothman DA; Rothman NL
Pa Nurse; 1978 Feb; 33(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 247270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
