BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6128317)

  • 1. Adhesion induction by suture of varying tissue reactivity and caliber.
    Holtz G
    Int J Fertil; 1982; 27(3):134-5. PubMed ID: 6128317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of peritoneal closure and suture material on adhesion formation in a rabbit model.
    Whitfield RR; Stills HF; Huls HR; Crouch JM; Hurd WW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):644.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine compression suture without hysterotomy--why a non-absorbable suture should be avoided.
    Cotzias C; Girling J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 15814394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Role of local fibrinolytic activity of the uterine horns in rats in the pathogenesis of formation of postoperative adhesions].
    Mynbaev OA; Rubl'oba KI; Liutova LV; Karabasova MA; Andreenko GV
    Patol Fiziol Eksp Ter; 1997; (1):35-8. PubMed ID: 9157382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Barbed vs standard suture: randomized single-blinded comparison of adhesion formation and ease of use in an animal model.
    Einarsson JI; Grazul-Bilska AT; Vonnahme KA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):716-9. PubMed ID: 21840774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesion formation to the uterine horn of the rat in response to nylon and a new absorbable clip.
    Lavy G; Graebe RA; Oelsner G; Boyers SP; DeCherney AH
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Mar; 164(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 3824109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of TC7 and 32% dextran 70 for prevention of postoperative adhesions in hamsters.
    Best CL; Rittenhouse D; Sueldo CE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):858-60. PubMed ID: 1717909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesion formation and histologic reaction with polydioxanone and polyglactin suture.
    Neff MR; Holtz GL; Betsill WL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 151(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 3917608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser and electrosurgery in terms of tissue injury and adhesion formation in a rabbit model.
    Schemmel M; Haefner HK; Selvaggi SM; Warren JS; Termin CS; Hurd WW
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Feb; 67(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 9022618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic clips. Evaluation of absorbable and titanium with regard to hemostasis and tissue reactivity.
    Grainger DA; Meyer WR; DeCherney AH; Diamond MP
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Jul; 36(7):493-5. PubMed ID: 1834838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adhesion prophylaxis in rabbits with Surgicel and two absorbable microsurgical sutures.
    Galan N; Leader A; Malkinson T; Taylor PJ
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Oct; 28(10):662-4. PubMed ID: 6689180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of barbed and conventional sutures in adhesion formation and histological features in a rat myomectomy model: randomized single blind controlled trial.
    Api M; Boza A; Cıkman MS; Aker FV; Onenerk M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():121-5. PubMed ID: 25562637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of amniotic membrane plus heparin to prevent postoperative adhesions in the rabbit.
    Tayyar M; Turan R; Ayata D
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 1993 Jun; 18(1-2):57-60. PubMed ID: 7940608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of fibrin sealant on single-layer uterine incision closure in the New Zealand white rabbit.
    Peacock KE; Hurst BS; Marshburn PB; Matthews ML
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Apr; 85 Suppl 1():1261-4. PubMed ID: 16616100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Macroscopic and histologic tissue reaction to polydioxanone, a new, synthetic, monofilament microsuture.
    Laufer N; Merino M; Trietsch HG; DeCherney AH
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 6427459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of passive motion and early vs. delayed ambulation on adhesion formation in rat uterine surgery.
    Das K; Penney LL; Critser JK
    Int J Fertil; 1990; 35(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 1977718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transverse uterine incision non-closure versus closure: an experimental study in sheep.
    Gül A; Simşek Y; Uğraş S; Gül T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):813-7. PubMed ID: 11304961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions using Carbylan-SX, a semisynthetic glycosaminoglycan hydrogel.
    Liu Y; Shu XZ; Prestwich GD
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Apr; 87(4):940-8. PubMed ID: 17157844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials.
    Rochat MC; Lin J; Pope ER; Carson WL; Wagner-Mann CC; Pace LW
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in ovarian microsurgery: experimental results in the rabbit model.
    Marana R; Muzii L; Catalano GF; Muscatello P; Mancuso S
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1990; 21(6):309-11. PubMed ID: 2132484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.