These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 613191)

  • 41. Role of laryngeal movement and effect of aging on swallowing pressure in the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter.
    Yokoyama M; Mitomi N; Tetsuka K; Tayama N; Niimi S
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Mar; 110(3 Pt 1):434-9. PubMed ID: 10718434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Healing or amelioration of esophagitis does not result in increased lower esophageal sphincter or esophageal contractile pressure.
    Allen ML; McIntosh DL; Robinson MG
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Oct; 85(10):1331-4. PubMed ID: 2220724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of esophageal manometric characteristics in asymptomatic subjects and symptomatic patients with high-amplitude esophageal peristaltic contractions.
    Traube M; McCallum RW
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1987 Sep; 82(9):831-5. PubMed ID: 3631028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Manometric effects of metopimazine on the lower esophageal sphincter (author's transl)].
    Gosselin A; Gosselin M; Bretagne JF
    Sem Hop; 1981 Feb 8-15; 57(5-6):291-5. PubMed ID: 6259751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of fundoplication on the lower esophageal sphincter.
    Bowes KL; Sarna SK
    Can J Surg; 1975 Jul; 18(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 1148958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of oral buspirone, pyridostigmine, and bethanechol on esophageal function evaluated with combined multichannel esophageal impedance-manometry in healthy volunteers.
    Blonski W; Vela MF; Freeman J; Sharma N; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 43(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18987553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverticulum: a reappraisal.
    Knuff TE; Benjamin SB; Castell DO
    Gastroenterology; 1982 Apr; 82(4):734-6. PubMed ID: 6800871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Clinico-manometric correlation in esophageal involvement of progressive systemic sclerosis].
    Corti RE; Outeda JL; Naveiro JJ; Nicolino D; Corti RN; Crosetti E
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 1982; 12(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 7136451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.
    Arndorfer RC; Stef JJ; Dodds WJ; Linehan JH; Hogan WJ
    Gastroenterology; 1977 Jul; 73(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 324861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-dimensional pressure image and muscular structure of the human lower esophageal sphincter.
    Stein HJ; Liebermann-Meffert D; DeMeester TR; Siewert JR
    Surgery; 1995 Jun; 117(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 7778032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The upper esophageal sphincter during normal deglutition. A simultaneous cineradiographic and manometric investigation.
    Isberg A; Nilsson ME; Schiratzki H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 4072751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters.
    Fang JC; Hilden K; Tuteja AK; Peterson KA
    Dig Dis Sci; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1657-63. PubMed ID: 15573923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measurement of pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter. The influence of catheter diameter.
    Kaye MD; Showalter JP
    Am J Dig Dis; 1974 Sep; 19(9):860-3. PubMed ID: 4853117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A method for continuous monitoring of upper esophageal sphincter pressure.
    Kahrilas PJ; Dent J; Dodds WJ; Hogan WJ; Arndorfer RC
    Dig Dis Sci; 1987 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 3803142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A novel portable perfused manometric system for recording of small intestinal motility.
    Samsom M; Smout AJ; Hebbard G; Fraser R; Omari T; Horowitz M; Dent J
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 1998 Apr; 10(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9614672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of perfusion rate and compliance on esophageal manometry.
    Zabinski MP; Spiro HM; Biancani P
    J Appl Physiol; 1975 Jan; 38(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 1110235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure. Effect of acute emotional stress.
    Cook IJ; Dent J; Shannon S; Collins SM
    Gastroenterology; 1987 Sep; 93(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 3609662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Lateral-hole catheters compared with shielded-hole catheter systems in oesophageal manometry.
    Sundström G; Ulmsten U
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1977 Nov; 37(7):661-5. PubMed ID: 594646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stability and Agreement of a Microtransducer and an Air-Filled Balloon Esophageal Catheter in the Monitoring of Esophageal Pressure.
    Augusto RM; Albuquerque AL; Jaeger T; de Carvalho CR; Caruso P
    Respir Care; 2017 Feb; 62(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27729399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of different fluid-filled systems for oesophageal manometry.
    Ask P; Tibbling L
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1979; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 424682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.