These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6139067)

  • 1. Contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography (initial experience).
    Seyferth W; Zeitler E
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():125-8. PubMed ID: 6139067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
    Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical trials in adults.
    Mathias K; Seemann W
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3523640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical study of iohexol in a double-blind trial with ioxaglate in the angiography of the lower extremities].
    Simunić S; Valinger-Petrović B; Radanović B; Cavka K; Stojanović J
    Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 3520200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Modification of the image quality of i.v. DSA by the iodine concentration of the contrast medium].
    Langer M; Felix R; Keysser R; Speck U; Banzer D
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Sep; 5(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 3902326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate.
    Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 2 nonionic contrast media for myelography].
    Lovrencić M; Klanfar Z; Jakovac I
    Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 3520199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of iopamidol in selective coronarography: a comparative study in relation to ioxaglate].
    Thévenin P; Amiel M
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):769-73. PubMed ID: 6367616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA; Sherry RA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a low osmolar contrast-medium (ioxaglate) in peripheral angiography. Clinical trials in 168 pediatric patients.
    Meradji M
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):47-50. PubMed ID: 3523641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phlebography. Survey and present state.
    Enge I
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S100-2. PubMed ID: 3882610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of ioxaglate in abdominal angiography].
    Kumazaki T; Sugawara K; Hosoi S; Honda K; Asahi R; Suzuki T; Kanazawa M
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1983 Mar; 28(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 6876458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].
    Schrott KM; Behrends B; Clauss W; Kaufmann J; Lehnert J
    Fortschr Med; 1986 Feb; 104(7):153-6. PubMed ID: 3516817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Iopromide versus ioglicinate in dynamic computer tomography--a randomized controlled double-blind study].
    Lindner R; Gailer H; Richter EI
    Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):362-6. PubMed ID: 6390726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Tolerance of the contrast medium ioxaglinic acid in angiographic examinations. A clinical study (author's transl)].
    von Dewitz H; Langer M; Langer R; Glöckler WT
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Oct; 33(10):525-8. PubMed ID: 7433844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experience of iotrolan].
    Ishikawa M; Handa H
    Nihon Geka Hokan; 1986 May; 55(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 3800545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intravenous pyelography in children comparative study: ioxitalamates - ioxaglates (author's transl)].
    Montagne JP; Fauré C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1982 Mar; 25(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 7092111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical experiences with Telebrix and Hexabrix in angiography.
    Bohutová J; Kolár J; Karmazin V; Stupákova Z
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6683857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.