These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6139067)

  • 21. [Cerebral angiography with a new low osmolarity contrast medium (Hexabrix). Analysis of 3500 cerebral angiograms with 7 contrast media].
    Bartko D; Brezná M; Koník I; Dornetzhuberová M
    Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1982 Jan; 45(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 7060172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast medium tolerance in computed tomography.
    Tschakert H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():156-61. PubMed ID: 6139072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparative study of 2 contrast media with low osmolarity in pediatric angiocardiography].
    Hoeffel JC; Donze B; Worms AM; Lostette Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):712-3. PubMed ID: 6367613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.
    Nakstad PH; Bakke SJ; Kjartansson O; von Krogh J
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1986; 7(2):303-4. PubMed ID: 3082163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incompatibility of Hexabrix and papaverine.
    Pilla TJ; Beshany SE; Shields JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1300-1. PubMed ID: 3486573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
    Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical experience with ioversol for angiography.
    Bettmann MA
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 2687199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA; Gentry LR; Matozzi F; Verma S
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The positive cholangiogram as a quality criterion for a cholangiographic agent (double-blind comparison between iodoxamate and iotroxate].
    Taenzer V; Rehrmann B; Wolf R; Zöllner G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1982 Feb; 35(2):43-6. PubMed ID: 6896099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Clinical use of low osmolar roentgen contrast media].
    Taenzer V
    Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):357-61. PubMed ID: 6505858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) of peripheral arteries with isotonic contrast materials].
    Yashiro N; Itai Y; Iio M
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1985 Jul; 30(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 3903287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Angiography with iohexol--a non-ionic contrast medium].
    Kumazaki T; Tajima H
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1984 Apr; 29(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 6471502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Double-blind comparison of iodipamide and lodoxamate using direct and drip infusion intravenous cholangiography.
    Moss AA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Jun; 128(6):931-3. PubMed ID: 414557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Painless peripheral arteriography with new contrast media of low osmolality (metrizamide and ioxaglate) (author's transl)].
    Suzuki S; Mine H; Yoshida T; Umehara I; Okada Y
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1981 Nov; 26(12):1313-20. PubMed ID: 7321248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thrombosis following phlebography with high-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media.
    Eliasen B; Hørup A; Jensen AR
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 May; 3(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 6347689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short survey of the total clinical material with iohexol.
    Dahlström K
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():23-4. PubMed ID: 6382933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Safer lumbar myelograms--the search continues.
    Mason K
    Can Nurse; 1983 Jun; 79(6):28. PubMed ID: 6552927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of low osmolar contrast media in (femoral) arteriography.
    Wolf KJ; Steidle B; Banzer D; Seyferth W; Keysser R
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():102-6. PubMed ID: 6139063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.