These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6139070)

  • 1. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate.
    Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT; Putman CE; Ulreich S; Koss N
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].
    Schrott KM; Behrends B; Clauss W; Kaufmann J; Lehnert J
    Fortschr Med; 1986 Feb; 104(7):153-6. PubMed ID: 3516817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography.
    Jorulf H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iohexol in urography. Survey and present state.
    Ekelund L
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():25-9. PubMed ID: 6206689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 2 nonionic contrast media for myelography].
    Lovrencić M; Klanfar Z; Jakovac I
    Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 3520199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urography with iohexol. Comparison with metrizoate and iodamide.
    Edgren J; Kivisaari A; Laasonen L; Standertskiöld-Nordenstam CG
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():46-9. PubMed ID: 6382934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
    Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urography with monomeric and dimeric nonionic contrast media: comparative, randomized, double-blind study of iotrolan 280 and iopromide 300.
    Taenzer V; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():116-8. PubMed ID: 2568778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of ioxaglate in abdominal angiography].
    Kumazaki T; Sugawara K; Hosoi S; Honda K; Asahi R; Suzuki T; Kanazawa M
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1983 Mar; 28(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 6876458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iohexol and diatrizoate: comparison in visceral arteriography.
    Adam A; Hemingway AP; Allison DJ
    Radiology; 1985 May; 155(2):529. PubMed ID: 3885316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN; Eng FW
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.