147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6139072)
1. Contrast medium tolerance in computed tomography.
Tschakert H
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():156-61. PubMed ID: 6139072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thrombosis following phlebography with high-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media.
Eliasen B; Hørup A; Jensen AR
Eur J Radiol; 1983 May; 3(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 6347689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate.
Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Iopromide versus ioglicinate in dynamic computer tomography--a randomized controlled double-blind study].
Lindner R; Gailer H; Richter EI
Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):362-6. PubMed ID: 6390726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Iotrolan versus iopamidol for radiculography: a randomized double-blind study.
Coutinho C; McGeorge A; Macpherson P; Teasdale E
Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):89-90. PubMed ID: 3280064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical trials with iotrolan in myelographic and computed tomography applications in the United States.
Goldstein HA; Pfennig D
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():167-70. PubMed ID: 2568788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Iohexol and ioxaglate in cerebral angiography.
Thron A; Ratzka M; Voigt K; Nadjmi M
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():115-9. PubMed ID: 6139065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [New contrast media for angiography (Telebrix, Hexabrix) (author's transl)].
Bohutová J; Kolár J; Karmazin V; Stupáková Z
Cas Lek Cesk; 1981; 120(50):1527-30. PubMed ID: 7326714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: lohexol compared with meglumine iothalamate.
Thomas ML; Bowles JN; Piaggio RB; Price J; Treweeke PS
Vasa; 1985; 14(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3883671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography (initial experience).
Seyferth W; Zeitler E
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():125-8. PubMed ID: 6139067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Iohexol and iopromide--two new non-ionic water-soluble radiographic contrast media: randomized, intraindividual double-blind study versus ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
Hagen B
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():107-14. PubMed ID: 6139064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemistry, physicochemistry and pharmacology of known and new contrast media for angiography, urography and CT enhancement.
Speck U; Mützel W; Weinmann HJ
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():2-10. PubMed ID: 6139075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Iotrolan versus iopamidol for cervical myelography: a randomized double-blind trial.
Coutinho C; McGeorge A; Macpherson P; Teasdale E
Br J Radiol; 1988 Oct; 61(730):965-7. PubMed ID: 3056560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of side effects during cerebral computed tomography with a nonionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Hordvik M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 6410735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of iopamidol in selective coronarography: a comparative study in relation to ioxaglate].
Thévenin P; Amiel M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):769-73. PubMed ID: 6367616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tolerance of contrast media in double injections].
Tschakert H
Rontgenpraxis; 1986 Sep; 39(9):287-92. PubMed ID: 3538442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Adverse reactions and intracranial contrast medium after myelography].
Fujii K; Hashimoto T; Isaza M; Hashimoto T; Hirabuki N; Miura T; Mitomo M; Kozuka T; Kawai R
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Mar; 34(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 2739082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Adverse reactions following high-dose intravenous injection of urographic contrast media].
Lackner K; Köster O; von Uexküll V; Broich H
Rofo; 1984 Oct; 141(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 6436920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]